2007
DOI: 10.21236/ada474060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-Based Detection Methods for Explosives

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real time detection of explosives and explosive devices continues to represent a major challenge for US and allied military forces in conflict areas throughout the world. Over the last decade or so, there have been a number of review articles that have addressed this subject from a variety of perspectives [1][2][3][4][5][6]. One of the clear outcomes from this body of work is that the ability to deter, predict, detect, respond to, and mitigate both improvised as well as conventional explosive threats is an issue from both a military and homeland security perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Real time detection of explosives and explosive devices continues to represent a major challenge for US and allied military forces in conflict areas throughout the world. Over the last decade or so, there have been a number of review articles that have addressed this subject from a variety of perspectives [1][2][3][4][5][6]. One of the clear outcomes from this body of work is that the ability to deter, predict, detect, respond to, and mitigate both improvised as well as conventional explosive threats is an issue from both a military and homeland security perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explosives represent only one area of concern, as the same sensing technology could be easily adaptable to the general class of threat agents that includes nuclear, biological, and environmental toxins. The ideal detection system for threat agents, whether these threats are explosives, chemical and biological agents, or illicit drugs, would possess high sensitivity (i.e., be capable of detecting threats present only at trace levels), be able to discern a threat amidst a real world background, possess a standoff capability, be straightforward to operate, and possess a real time sensing potential [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. This last operational criterion will be critical whether the sensor is deployed at a military checkpoint, for airport security, or for any other domestic application where impeding the flow of commerce is an issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods of standoff detection of explosive traces on surfaces of objects, such as Raman spectroscopy [9 - 12], laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) [9 - 12, 14], and laserinduced fluorescence of photofragmentation/photodissociation products (PF - LIF, PD - LIF) [9,11,15] have already been tested under real conditions and are currently considered to be the most mature and advanced technologies. At the same time, none of these methods satisfy in full measure the requirements to standoff sensor devices [9 - 11, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 On site detection, using screening tests and/or mobile detectors is of particular interest in environmental studies as such methods could allow for early enough detection to prevent pollutants from entering groundwater systems from soils. 5 A considerable research effort has been made to develop onsite detection techniques using such established methods as color screening tests, 6 immunoassays and sensors, [7][8][9][10][11] electrochemical detection , 11,12 laser detection, 13 ion mobility spectrometry, 14,15 and canine olfactory sensing . 16 More recently, former military munitions testing sites have become of interest in terms of assessing the levels of contamination 17,18 and identifying the need for and most effective avenue of remediation.…”
Section: History Of Environmental Explosives Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%