2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.10.025
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser ablation versus mechanochemical ablation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinically, both EVLA and MOCA were highly efficacious in the treatment of SVI, thus showing a significant improvement in VCSS and patient symptoms as reflected in the improved generic and disease-specific quality of life of the patients. Multiple randomized trials have shown that symptomatic outcomes are comparable or even superior in MOCA to patients receiving EVLA or RFA, with increased speed of improvement in VCSS scores following MOCA [243][244][245][246][247]. Furthermore, it was observed that the procedural discomfort from MOCA was as low as or lower than EVLA and that the postprocedure pain from MOCA during the first week tended to be lower [243,247].…”
Section: Cyanoacrylate Embolization (Cae)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinically, both EVLA and MOCA were highly efficacious in the treatment of SVI, thus showing a significant improvement in VCSS and patient symptoms as reflected in the improved generic and disease-specific quality of life of the patients. Multiple randomized trials have shown that symptomatic outcomes are comparable or even superior in MOCA to patients receiving EVLA or RFA, with increased speed of improvement in VCSS scores following MOCA [243][244][245][246][247]. Furthermore, it was observed that the procedural discomfort from MOCA was as low as or lower than EVLA and that the postprocedure pain from MOCA during the first week tended to be lower [243,247].…”
Section: Cyanoacrylate Embolization (Cae)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was observed that the procedural discomfort from MOCA was as low as or lower than EVLA and that the post-procedure pain from MOCA during the first week tended to be lower [ 243 , 247 ]. MOCA patients also had lower rates of postoperative phlebitis and returned to work earlier than EVLA patients [ 245 ].…”
Section: Advances In Minimally Invasive Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minor complications include pain, bruising, and paresthesias which reportedly occurred at rates of 21, 15, and 4%, respectively. 15 In one retrospective study, skin pigmentation occurred at a rate of 6.9%. 16 One of the most significant complications that may occur with EVLA is endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), by which clot related to EVLA treatment in a superficial vein is propagated into a deep vein resulting in DVT and possible pulmonary embolism.…”
Section: Endovenous Laser Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment with MOCA resulted in less postoperative pain/edema and a faster improvement in the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in the short term but more hyperpigmentation compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) [7]. In addition, MOCA was associated with a significant reduction in rates of ecchymosis and hematoma formation and postoperative phlebitis and a shorter time to return to work compared with thermal ablation [2,8]. In comparative studies, including the Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation to RADiOf-requeNcy Ablation (MARADONA) study [7], short-term (6-month) outcomes were similar with MOCA and RFA, but there were more anatomical failures between 6 months and 3 years after MOCA than after RFA [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%