2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser ablation of advanced ceramics and glass-ceramic materials: Reference position dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for machining large areas, it is necessary to deflect the laser beam over the sample or to move the sample by using a translation stage if the laser system is not equipped with a scanning head. It was shown that, in this machining method, the maximal machined depth and removed volume were achieved by placing the sample out of focus [32,33,34]. As shown in Figure 2a, this phenomenon also holds for the case of these eutectic glasses and glass-ceramic samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, for machining large areas, it is necessary to deflect the laser beam over the sample or to move the sample by using a translation stage if the laser system is not equipped with a scanning head. It was shown that, in this machining method, the maximal machined depth and removed volume were achieved by placing the sample out of focus [32,33,34]. As shown in Figure 2a, this phenomenon also holds for the case of these eutectic glasses and glass-ceramic samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is worth mentioning that the machined depth for the glass-ceramic was slightly lower than for the glass, which is related to the higher hardness of the glass-ceramic, 495 HV, versus 458 HV for the glass. It was also demonstrated that there exists a close relation between the ablation yields and the material hardness, such that the harder the material is, the lower the ablation yields [32,34]. Figure 2b depicts that, although the machined depth increased with the number of iterations, the average depth decreased for a number of iterations higher than 40.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worth mentioning is that the volume and depth removed reach their maximum value out of focus. This behavior is independent of the substrate to be machined . The reference distance where they are reached is around 500 and 700 μm below the focal plane for 1 and 2 kHz, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The sample was placed 0.4 mm under the focus position to maximize the removal rate (~0.01 mm 3 /s). In this situation the area irradiated in every pulse is about 3 times larger than in focus position, but still receives enough irradiance to evaporate the material [37].…”
Section: Laser Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%