2007
DOI: 10.1016/s2173-5735(07)70381-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Correlation Between Symptoms and Signs by Means of Clinical Assessment Questionnaires and Fibroendoscopy. Is This Sufficient for Diagnosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RFS and RSI were found to have limited value, particularly in symptomatic patients in three other studies, in concordance with the results of our study . Park reviewing a group of globus patients concluded that the RSI and RFS were less valid as diagnostic tools for LPR when used independently .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RFS and RSI were found to have limited value, particularly in symptomatic patients in three other studies, in concordance with the results of our study . Park reviewing a group of globus patients concluded that the RSI and RFS were less valid as diagnostic tools for LPR when used independently .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Park reviewing a group of globus patients concluded that the RSI and RFS were less valid as diagnostic tools for LPR when used independently . A Spanish group found the RFS and RSI to be particularly limited in symptomatic patients who actually attend clinics and therefore suggested the RFS and RSI should not be used in isolation . Keichner et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] In contrast to the above studies, in our study we observed no statistically significant correlation between RSI and RFS (r = 0.078; P = 0.501) at baseline, as well as on follow-up after treatment (r = 0.172, P = 0.136). We have also observed that patients with a high symptom score (RSI > 13) had no corresponding signs or high RFS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…11 similarly, in another study done by Vázquez de la Iglesia et al on 34 patients, a statistically significant correlation was found between the RSI and RFS (r = 0.3, p = 0.007). 12 Unlike all these studies, Satish et al study result shows no correlation between the RSI and RFS (p=0.501). 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%