2003
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-96.4.1153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Larval Sampling and Instar Determination in Field Populations of Northern and Western Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary experiments indicated 17 days at 24°C would allow larvae on isoline to develop to third instar (final instar) but not progress to pre-pupal or pupal stages. Larvae recovered from each Berlese were counted, and head capsule widths were measured using an ocular micrometer on a stereo microscope (Bausch and Lomb Stereo â , San Diego, CA) to determine the larval instar (George and Hintz 1966;Hammack et al 2003). The combined fresh weight (larvae were removed from 70% ethyl alcohol and air-dried for 3 min on Kimwipes â , Kimberly-Clark, Atlanta, GA before weighing) of surviving larvae per replication was measured using a pan balance (Mettler-Toledo, Columbus, OH; precision: 0.01), and average fresh weight per larva was determined by dividing the weight by the number of larvae per replication.…”
Section: On-plant Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary experiments indicated 17 days at 24°C would allow larvae on isoline to develop to third instar (final instar) but not progress to pre-pupal or pupal stages. Larvae recovered from each Berlese were counted, and head capsule widths were measured using an ocular micrometer on a stereo microscope (Bausch and Lomb Stereo â , San Diego, CA) to determine the larval instar (George and Hintz 1966;Hammack et al 2003). The combined fresh weight (larvae were removed from 70% ethyl alcohol and air-dried for 3 min on Kimwipes â , Kimberly-Clark, Atlanta, GA before weighing) of surviving larvae per replication was measured using a pan balance (Mettler-Toledo, Columbus, OH; precision: 0.01), and average fresh weight per larva was determined by dividing the weight by the number of larvae per replication.…”
Section: On-plant Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of larvae recovered from each bioassay container was counted. For all larvae, we used a microscope (Leica MZ6) with digital camera and image analysis software (Motic Images Inc.) to measure width of larval head capsules and then determined larval instar based on the scale of Hammack et al 51 To ensure that larvae were not pupating in bioassay cups, we carefully inspected the soil of three bioassay cups for each of the four maize hybrids evaluated (DCK 6169, DCK 6172, 2T777 and 2T789) for three of 2010…”
Section: Disclosure Of Potential Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larvae extracted from each plant were counted and classified into larval stages (L1, L2, and L3) by measuring head capsule width as described by Hammack et al (2003). The WCR root feeding was evaluated based on the root fresh weight of four plant replicates for each treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%