2015
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnv259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Values of Newforms on GL(2) with Highly Ramified Central Character

Abstract: Abstract. We give a lower bound for the sup-norm of an L 2 -normalized newform in an irreducible, unitary, cuspidal representation π of GL2 over a number field. When the central character of π is sufficiently ramified, this bound improves upon the trivial bound by a positive power of N where N is the norm of the conductor of π. This generalizes a result of Templier, who dealt with the special case when the conductor of the central character equals the conductor of the representation. We also make a conjecture … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If π is non-spherical then the situation looks completely different. However, recent lower bounds for W π were used to justify large sup-norms of modular forms in the level aspect, see [12,15]. In [13], the author used second moments of W π to prove the, at present, best hybrid bound for the sup-norm of Maaß forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If π is non-spherical then the situation looks completely different. However, recent lower bounds for W π were used to justify large sup-norms of modular forms in the level aspect, see [12,15]. In [13], the author used second moments of W π to prove the, at present, best hybrid bound for the sup-norm of Maaß forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], the author raised a question about the exact size of the functions W π , and in [12] the author put forward a conjecture for the case of a weakly ramified central character. In this paper we will answer [12,Question 1]. It turns out that [12,Conjecture 2] is wrong in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• This theorem generalizes the methods from [23] and [12] to number fields. We also implement some ideas from [17] in order to deal with arbitrary level and central character.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we used the definition of the Gauß sum given in [17]. We evaluate this explicitly in terms of ǫ-factors using [17, (6)].…”
Section: The Constants Term Of E(s G)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Theorem 1.3 hinges on the p-adic analysis of the values of W f, p , which is a purely local question about π f, p . To access these values, we use the local Fourier expansion of W f, p and analyze the resulting local Fourier coefficients c t, ℓ (χ) with the help of the recent "basic identity" (reviewed in §3.5) that was derived by the third-named author in [Sah16] from the GL 2 local functional equation of Jacquet-Langlands [JL70].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%