2018
DOI: 10.1090/tran/7685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the size of 𝑝-adic Whittaker functions

Abstract: In this paper we tackle a question raised by N. Templier and A. Saha concerning the size of Whittaker new vectors appearing in infinite dimensional representations of GL 2 over non-archimedean fields. We derive precise bounds for such functions in all possible situations. Our main tool is the p-adic method of stationary phase.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first observe that for each g ∈ K0,p (1) we have det(g) ∈ (o × p ) 2 +̟ p o p . Thus, if a(χ p ) ≤ 1 we have χ p (g) = 1 for all g ∈ K0,p (1).…”
Section: Further We Number Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first observe that for each g ∈ K0,p (1) we have det(g) ∈ (o × p ) 2 +̟ p o p . Thus, if a(χ p ) ≤ 1 we have χ p (g) = 1 for all g ∈ K0,p (1).…”
Section: Further We Number Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this we define t ν = (t ν,1 − t ν,2 )/2. Then the correct spectral parameter for the Eisenstein series E v (s, ·) is (λ ν (s)) ν , where λ ν (s) = 1 4 + (t ν + s) 2 if ν is real, 1 + 4(t ν + s) 2 if ν is complex.…”
Section: Set-up and Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy is to start from (A.1) and insert the expressions from[2, Lemma 2.2]. Let us first deal with some easy cases.If 0 ≤ l < a 2 , we have t = −n p + r andS t,l = µ∈X ′ l , t=−np ζ Fp (1)q −l p χ 1 (̟ a2−a1 p ) a 1 < l ≤ n, we have t = −2l + r and S t,l = µ∈X ′ l , t=−2l ζ Fp (1)q −l p χ 1 (̟ 0 p ) 2 ≤ ζ Fp (1) if r = 0, 0 else.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be possible to extend the argument to prove a non-trivial hybrid bound (simultaneously in the depth and eigenvalue aspects) for the sup-norm; however, we do not attempt to do so here. The method of this paper can be combined with the Fourier/Whittaker expansion at various cusps in the adelic context (the necessary machinery for which is now available thanks to recent work of Assing [Ass19] building on earlier work of the second author [Sah16, Sah17]) to give a depth-aspect sub-local bound in the case (possibly with a different exponent than in Theorem A due to some differences in the counting argument). Finally, this paper provides a general strategy of how one should go about improving the local bound in the level aspect in cases where the local vectors are not sufficiently localized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%