2012
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large spontaneous emission enhancement in plasmonic nanocavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
370
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
370
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous work investigating PL enhancement in single nanoparticles and nanoantennas 3,40,41 or in Fano-type 30,42,43 and hyperbolic metamaterials 31,32 , our SRR metamaterial supports both electric and magnetic modes that are spectrally matched to the emission of semiconductor QDs at around l QD ¼ 800 nm wavelength. Since both modes in our metamaterial can be engineered independently from each other, our QD metamaterial offers new opportunities to tailor the spontaneous emission of quantum emitters into two independent radiative decay channels.…”
contrasting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to previous work investigating PL enhancement in single nanoparticles and nanoantennas 3,40,41 or in Fano-type 30,42,43 and hyperbolic metamaterials 31,32 , our SRR metamaterial supports both electric and magnetic modes that are spectrally matched to the emission of semiconductor QDs at around l QD ¼ 800 nm wavelength. Since both modes in our metamaterial can be engineered independently from each other, our QD metamaterial offers new opportunities to tailor the spontaneous emission of quantum emitters into two independent radiative decay channels.…”
contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…3a,b show that for y-polarized detection (magnetic mode) the PL-enhancement factors are on average B1.5; however, there are spatial positions where enhancement of up to approximately three can be observed. This is a notable enhancement given that, in contrast to single plasmonic structures 3,40,49 where a precise placement of the emitters is possible 40,41,50 , large PLenhancement factors are harder to realize in metamaterials since, here, the main focus is on the spatially averaged effective response of the coupled QD metamaterial. For this reason, in our experiments and numerical simulations, we average over all possible distances, lateral positions and dipole orientations of the QDs with regard to the split-ring-resonator meta-atom.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modification of the spontaneous emission rate of a quantum emitter induced by its environment, known as the Purcell effect [17,18], is not so pronounced in alldielectric structures [2,19], as in microcavities [20] or plasmonic nanoantennas [21,22]. This is due to the fact that optical resonances of high-index nanoparticles are characterized by relatively low quality factors and large mode volumes, which results in low efficiency of light-matter interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 These nano-plasmonic devices have a wide variety of applications in systems that rely on strong optical fields, such as surface-enhanced Raman scattering, 3,4 nanoscale nonlinear optics, [5][6][7] optical tweezing, 8,9 fluorescence enhancement, 10 and large Purcell enhancement of quantum emitters. 11,12 Plasmonic field enhancement becomes much stronger as the gap size is reduced to nanometer scale. This effect has been demonstrated in various applications: Purcell enhancements larger than 1000 were achieved using silver nanowires or nanocubes on metal films with spacing of 5-15 nm; 11,12 surface-enhanced Raman scattering increases by orders of magnitude when the gap of gold dimers decreases; 4 and optical trapping simulations show that tapered 5-nm gap coaxial apertures could trap 2-nm dielectric particle with reasonable laser powers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%