2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large shocks and the September 11th terrorist attacks on international stock markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, many authors argue that the GARCH(1,1) specification model is the most appropriate for predicting volatility given the existence of ARCH effect in returns series (Ramlall, 2010;Nikkinen et al 2008;Charles and Darne, 2006;Bollerslev et al, 1994). Second, the choice of the GARCH model is made after a comparison with a non-linear EGARCH specification.…”
Section: Results Of Conditional Volatility Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, many authors argue that the GARCH(1,1) specification model is the most appropriate for predicting volatility given the existence of ARCH effect in returns series (Ramlall, 2010;Nikkinen et al 2008;Charles and Darne, 2006;Bollerslev et al, 1994). Second, the choice of the GARCH model is made after a comparison with a non-linear EGARCH specification.…”
Section: Results Of Conditional Volatility Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that the QML-t estimator seems to estimate better the marginal variance. We tend to think that good parameter estimates lead to good volatility estimates; see Charles and Darné (2006). However, this might not be true due to non-linearities.…”
Section: Robust Estimation Of the Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Dijk, Franses, and Lucas (1999) demonstrate that neglecting additive outliers frequently leads to a rejection of the null hypothesis of homoskedasticity, when it is in fact true. Tolvi (2001) and Charles and Darné (2006), however, show another possibility. That is, outliers can hide the ARCH tests of the series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%