Abstract:a b s t r a c t GARCH volatilities depend on the unconditional variance, which is a non-linear function of the parameters. Consequently, they can have larger biases than estimated parameters. Using robust methods to estimate both parameters and volatilities is shown to outperform Maximum Likelihood procedures.
“…15 13 The estimates of dummies variables are not reported to save space, but they are all significant and available from the authors upon request. 14 The out-of-sample comparison is beyond the scope of this study. Future research is encouraged to address this issue.…”
Section: Results Of the Persistence Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of measuring the degree to which past volatilities determine and explain the current volatility, a careful investigation of various possible explanations on this fact should 18 Haldrup and Nielsen (2007) show that an additive outlier may substantially bias the differencing parameter estimate in ARFIMA processes. Carnero et al (2007Carnero et al ( , 2012) and Ng and McAleer (2004) who show that the QML estimators can be severally affected by additive outliers, i.e. both the GARCH parameters can be overestimated or underestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the volatility models is evaluated from various in-sample criteria: LogLikehood (LL), Akaike (AIC), Hannan-Quinn (HQ) and stochastic complexity (RCL) (Rissanen, 1987) criteria. 14 Caporin (2003) show that information criteria can clearly distinguish between long and short memory data generating processes. McKenzie (2003, 2008) find that the HQ and RCL criteria exhibit a clear superiority in their ability to accurately select the correct model for ARCH and GARCH processes.…”
Section: Results Of the Persistence Estimatesmentioning
Financial market participants and policy-makers can benefit from a better understanding of how shocks can affect volatility over time. This study assesses the impact of structural changes and outliers on volatility persistence of three crude oil markets -Brent, West Texas Intermediate (WTI)
“…15 13 The estimates of dummies variables are not reported to save space, but they are all significant and available from the authors upon request. 14 The out-of-sample comparison is beyond the scope of this study. Future research is encouraged to address this issue.…”
Section: Results Of the Persistence Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of measuring the degree to which past volatilities determine and explain the current volatility, a careful investigation of various possible explanations on this fact should 18 Haldrup and Nielsen (2007) show that an additive outlier may substantially bias the differencing parameter estimate in ARFIMA processes. Carnero et al (2007Carnero et al ( , 2012) and Ng and McAleer (2004) who show that the QML estimators can be severally affected by additive outliers, i.e. both the GARCH parameters can be overestimated or underestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the volatility models is evaluated from various in-sample criteria: LogLikehood (LL), Akaike (AIC), Hannan-Quinn (HQ) and stochastic complexity (RCL) (Rissanen, 1987) criteria. 14 Caporin (2003) show that information criteria can clearly distinguish between long and short memory data generating processes. McKenzie (2003, 2008) find that the HQ and RCL criteria exhibit a clear superiority in their ability to accurately select the correct model for ARCH and GARCH processes.…”
Section: Results Of the Persistence Estimatesmentioning
Financial market participants and policy-makers can benefit from a better understanding of how shocks can affect volatility over time. This study assesses the impact of structural changes and outliers on volatility persistence of three crude oil markets -Brent, West Texas Intermediate (WTI)
“…2 We analyze all the methods of estimation using the mean squared error (MSE) as in Kristensen and Linton (2006) and the biases in the estimation of the volatility as in Carnero et al (2012).…”
Section: The Robustificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time series literature, it is well known the importance of using robust estimators for measuring the time series dependence. The volatility is estimated by using robust filters proposed by Muler and Yohai (2008) and Carnero et al (2012). Furthermore, the small sample properties of our proposal in the estimation of parameters and volatility are analyzed via intensive Monte Carlo experiments and compared to those of the existing alternatives in the literature.…”
In this paper we extend the closed-form estimator for the GARCH(1,1) proposed by Kristensen and Linton (2006) to deal with additive outliers. It has the advantage that is per se more robust that the maximum likelihood estimator (ML) often used to estimate this model, it is easy to implement and does not require the use of any numerical optimization procedure. The robustification of the closed-form estimator is done by replacing the sample autocorrelations by a robust estimator of these correlations and by estimating the volatility using robust filters. The performance of our proposal in estimating the parameters and the volatility of the GARCH(1,1) model is compared with the proposals existing in the literature via intensive Monte Carlo experiments and the results of these experiments show that our proposal outperforms the ML and quasi-maximum likelihood (QMLE) estimators based procedures. Finally, we fit the robust closed-form estimator and the benchmarks to one series of financial returns and analyze their performances in estimating and forecasting the volatility and the Value-at-Risk.JEL-Classifications: C22; C53; C58
This paper compares Generalized Autoregressive Score (GAS) models and GARCH-type models on their forecasting abilities for crude oil and natural gas spot and futures returns from developing and developed markets over multiple horizons. The out-of-sample forecasting results based on two loss functions and the Diebold-Mariano predictive accuracy test for multiple models show that the GAS framework outperforms GARCH and EGARCH models, particularly for crude oil assets. For natural gas, no specific model retains an advantage
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.