2017
DOI: 10.1093/botlinnean/box013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale phylogenetic analysis of Amorphophallus (Araceae) derived from nuclear and plastid sequences reveals new subgeneric delineation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
56
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research has focused on in vitro propagation systems, due to the accumulation of pathogens from normal asexual reproduction, to increase the yield of Amorphophallus 3,4 . The nucleotide sequences ( ITS1 ) and plastid sequences ( rbcL and matK ) revealed a new subgeneric delineation by large-scale phylogenetic analysis of Amorphophallus 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has focused on in vitro propagation systems, due to the accumulation of pathogens from normal asexual reproduction, to increase the yield of Amorphophallus 3,4 . The nucleotide sequences ( ITS1 ) and plastid sequences ( rbcL and matK ) revealed a new subgeneric delineation by large-scale phylogenetic analysis of Amorphophallus 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like all of the Amorphophallus species in the Philippines, A. minimus is treated as a member of subg. Amorphophallus (Claudel et al 2017). The appendix of most Amorphophallus species is smooth and acuminate; however, the clavate and colliculate appendix is a unique and striking combination that makes A. minimus easy to distinguish from all other currently described Amorphophallus species.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, working groups of systematists have applied the results of phylogenetic analyses to revise infrafamilial classifications (e.g. Schneider et al 2014;Bone et al 2015;Chacón et al 2016;Claudel et al 2017;De Faria et al 2017;Simões & Staples 2017), an endeavour that is still ongoing. Systematists have spent great effort in revising the classification of angiosperms because of the awareness that phylogenetics has brought methodological rigour to systematics and predictivity to classifications, which enabled the treatment of phylogenetic relationships -and therefore of classifications -as testable hypotheses, rather than opinions of scientists, however scholarly they might be.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2016 ; Claudel et al . 2017 ; De Faria et al . 2017 ; Simões & Staples 2017 ), an endeavour that is still ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%