2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The atoms in the molecule possess a nuclear spin of +1/2 or −1/2, and overall nuclear spins of the molecules are equal to 0 or 1. In ortho‐hydrogen, the proton nuclear spins are in similar direction, but in para‐hydrogen, the proton nuclear spins are in the opposite direction . The para‐hydrogen has low energy compared with the ortho state.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The atoms in the molecule possess a nuclear spin of +1/2 or −1/2, and overall nuclear spins of the molecules are equal to 0 or 1. In ortho‐hydrogen, the proton nuclear spins are in similar direction, but in para‐hydrogen, the proton nuclear spins are in the opposite direction . The para‐hydrogen has low energy compared with the ortho state.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ortho-hydrogen, the proton nuclear spins are in similar direction, but in para-hydrogen, the proton nuclear spins are in the opposite direction. 3 The para-hydrogen has low energy compared with the ortho state. One of the most influential factors on hydrogen liquefaction is the ortho-to-para conversion.…”
Section: Ortho-to-para Hydrogen Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since liquefying hydrogen is an energy costly process, its efficiency has to be increased to above 0.5 of the Carnot efficiency [7] with the best numbers now below 0.3 among the world-leading LH 2 plants. [8,9] Novel proposals have been made to increase the efficiency, including a multistep process to collect the wasted energies, [9] which in turn will increase the cost and efficiency, and the aim close to 0.5 is still a great obstacle for the traditional gas compress-expansion processes.Magnetic refrigeration using the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) of a magnetic material is, in principle, a most efficient way for LH 2 because the MCE involving the spin-spin interaction can operate at ideal Carnot circle and the entropy density of an MC material is generally thousands times more than that of the gaseous form. [10][11][12] Adiabatic demagnetization refrigeration (ADR) can achieve above 90% of the Carnot efficiency with a limited temperature span, whereas the active magnetic regenerate refrigerator (AMR) designed to give enough temperature spans did not realize the estimated efficiency yet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%