2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Scale Experimental Study of Precast Segmental Unbonded Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Columns for Seismic Regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the ability to accurately model the behaviour of manufactured structural elements, this design philosophy has to date been utilised extensively in structural designs. Examples of such a method are the introduction of ductility in the design of beams and columns of a steel-frame structure or the use of unbonded tendons to give ductile behaviour of beam-column joints (Holden et al, 2003;Ou et al, 2010;Pampanin, 2005;Smith et al, 2011). With designs being led by structural engineers combined with a perceived or real lack of ability to characterise the seismic response of the soil, ductility has not been widely included into the design of the soil-foundation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the ability to accurately model the behaviour of manufactured structural elements, this design philosophy has to date been utilised extensively in structural designs. Examples of such a method are the introduction of ductility in the design of beams and columns of a steel-frame structure or the use of unbonded tendons to give ductile behaviour of beam-column joints (Holden et al, 2003;Ou et al, 2010;Pampanin, 2005;Smith et al, 2011). With designs being led by structural engineers combined with a perceived or real lack of ability to characterise the seismic response of the soil, ductility has not been widely included into the design of the soil-foundation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield displacement is defined by extending the slop, which is connected from the original point (zero force-displacement) to the lateral force level corresponding to the first yield of longitudinal reinforcement, up to the average lateral force level between that lateral force and the lateral strength. The ultimate displacement is defined at the drift when the cyclic response envelope drops below 80% of the lateral strength [7]. Table 2 summarizes the ductility performance for the comparison with similar previous test results.…”
Section: Quasi-static Cyclic Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been developed to improve their seismic performance by increasing their energy dissipation capacity. The most popular approach to increase the energy dissipation capacity of the columns is the use of metallic yielding components at the base of the columns, such as mild steel bars [6,7], high-performance steel bars [8], exterior yielding braces [3,9], and shape memory alloy bars [10,11]. Steel or FRP jackets [12,13], ductile fiber-reinforced concrete [14], and ultra-high performance steel fiber concrete (UFC) segments [15] have also been adopted at the base of the columns, as well as non-metallic devices such as rubber pads [3], elastomeric bearing pads [13,16], and steel shear resistant connecting across segment joints including the base of the column [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a rocking column, the concrete in the unbonded region develops insignificant tensile strain. However, it remains susceptible to compression damage, including spalling of concrete cover [27][28][29]. Use of HyFRC in rocking columns has been shown to be effective in resisting compression damage at the rocking plane, improving the overall ductility of the column [13,14].…”
Section: Design Of Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%