2015
DOI: 10.1680/geot.sip.15.p.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new macro-element model encapsulating the dynamic moment–rotation behaviour of raft foundations

Abstract: A new macro-element model encapsulating the dynamic moment-rotation behaviour of raft foundations. Geotechnique, 65 (5). pp. 442-451. ISSN 1751-7656 Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34863/1/2015%20-%20Heron%20-%20Geotechnique%20-%20A%20new%20macro-element%20model%20encapsulating%20the%20dynamic %20moment-rotation%20behaviour%20of%20raft%20foundations.pdf Copyright and reuse:The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitude of rotations presented here for the symmetric structures used in Tests A and B are of the same order of magnitude as those observed for rigid, symmetric structures with shallow foundations on dry sand [36,37,38] and on liquefiable layers [39]. However, the moment transmitted from the structure to the underlying soil was far less for structures on shallow foundations than those with basements presented here.…”
Section: Moment Transmitted From Structure To Underlying Soilsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amplitude of rotations presented here for the symmetric structures used in Tests A and B are of the same order of magnitude as those observed for rigid, symmetric structures with shallow foundations on dry sand [36,37,38] and on liquefiable layers [39]. However, the moment transmitted from the structure to the underlying soil was far less for structures on shallow foundations than those with basements presented here.…”
Section: Moment Transmitted From Structure To Underlying Soilsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Shallow foundations on dry sand have been observed to lift off the soil surface when rocking [37,38]. This was not observed in liquefied soil by Adamidis and Madabhushi [39] using shallow foundations or in the tests presented here using structures with basements.…”
Section: Moment Transmitted From Structure To Underlying Soilmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…While simplified approximate methods have been presented in a number of recent works [54][55][56][57][58] where soil yielding and foundation uplifting are integrated into a single element, researchers and engineers are more accustomed to nonlinear hysteretic Winkler foundation (NHWF) models because of their capability of explicitly and physically capturing the foundation uplift and inelastic soil deformation, which enabled them to find their way into the current seismic standard ASCE/SEI 41-17. [59] Compared with the aforementioned elastic WF models, the NHWF models consist of distributed nonlinear hysteretic elements that simulate the coupled vertical-rotational foundation response considering yielding of soils.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there seems to be a general trend among centrifuge SSI researchers to use more intricate superstructure models to capture the full soil‐structure system response: be it material nonlinearities in the soil, geometric nonlinearities at the foundation, and even nonlinearities in the superstructure . Jabary and Madabhushi were among the first researchers to employ dynamic centrifuge testing to investigate the performance of buildings with tuned mass dampers (TMDs) on sand.…”
Section: Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%