Large-Scale Events as Catalysts for Creating Mutual Dependence Between Social Ventures and Resource Providers

Abstract

We examine the resource mobilization efforts undertaken by a social venture to organize the 2003 Special Olympics World Summer Games and bring about a change in social attitudes towards the cause of learning and intellectual disabilities. In contrast to previously advanced views of social ventures as powerless actors, we find instead that they are able to leverage the visibility afforded by large-scale events to create positions of mutual dependence, which allow them to access broad support bases and assert themselves in relationships with external parties. Specifically, we find that resource mobilization involves six distinct tactics rooted in the softer forms of power, namely, attraction and inducement. The use of these soft-power tactics depends upon the social venture's goal at different moments of the relationship with its partners and the level of support available from each external party. Our elaborated theory highlights both the role and limitations of soft power in mobilizing resources and managing relationships.

Sport and Social Entrepreneurship: A Review of a Concept in Progress

“…Another area of focus are the different tactics which McNamara et al (2015) propose to be of importance when social ventures mobilize external resources and generate income.…”

“…Kiernan & Porter (2014) Sports science (sports sociology) Empirical 19. McNamara et al (2015) Economics and business administration (management) Empirical…”

The Survival of Interorganizational Networks: A Proposal Based on Resource Dependence Theory

“…The relationship between the companies at that moment is based on a partnership approach, in which a company depends on the other partner companies to stabilize the flow of existing resources and activities in the network (Gulati, 1998). As a result, members are assumed to easily share mutual expectations and set common goals for collaborative success and sustainable relationships (McNamara, Pazzaglia, & Sonpar, 2015).…”

Social impact measurement in social enterprises: An interdependence perspective

“…Applying this to our domain, major resource providers providing substantial resources for the development of the organizations are theorized to have the authority to impact organizations' decisions and activities (Pfeffer & Salancik, 2003). The symmetric tie is also characterized as a committed and cohesive partnership that is based on frequent interactions to develop sustainable and beneficial collaborations between parties (McNamara, Pazzaglia, & Sonpar, 2015;Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011;Villanueva, Van de Ven, & Sapienza, 2012). The symmetric tie is also characterized as a committed and cohesive partnership that is based on frequent interactions to develop sustainable and beneficial collaborations between parties (McNamara, Pazzaglia, & Sonpar, 2015;Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011;Villanueva, Van de Ven, & Sapienza, 2012).…”