2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl011772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large loss of total ozone during the Arctic winter of 1999/2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
81
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(3 reference statements)
12
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies with SLIMCAT have shown a good agreement between the model and the observed large depletion in the lower stratosphere in this cold winter (Sinnhuber et al, 2000). These older runs used the purely θ -coordinate model and were forced by UKMO analyses.…”
Section: Winter 1999/2000: Comparison With Ozone Sondesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies with SLIMCAT have shown a good agreement between the model and the observed large depletion in the lower stratosphere in this cold winter (Sinnhuber et al, 2000). These older runs used the purely θ -coordinate model and were forced by UKMO analyses.…”
Section: Winter 1999/2000: Comparison With Ozone Sondesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All runs presented here are initialized on the 9 December 1999 and carried forward to June 2000 and output is taken at 15 min intervals. Comparisons of the ozone mixing ratios in SLIMCAT with measurements show good agreement in the 1999/2000 winter (Sinnhuber et al, 2000).…”
Section: Instruments and Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The polar low stratosphere was consistently cold, with more widespread temperatures below the PSC threshold than any other winter in the last 20 years and the largest ever local loss reported for the Arctic (Sinnhuber et al, 2000;Rex et al, 2002). Extensive denitrification occurred in the polar vortex (Fahey et al, 2001;Carslaw et al, 2002) and as a result, ozone losses were large during the winter and continued during the final warming in mid-March (when temperatures had risen above the PSC threshold) due to the hindered reconversion of ClO x to ClONO 2 (Sinnhuber et al, 2000). The vortex itself was stable until the final warming when it broke up with one substantial remnant present until April (Waugh and Rong, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SLIMCAT calculation was performed for this winter (1999/2000) and the ozone evolution agreed well with data (Sinnhuber et al, 2000). To investigate ozone change based on SLIMCAT, we calculated ozone loss in several ways.…”
Section: Estimated Ozone Loss In the Vortexmentioning
confidence: 99%