2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Interobserver Variation in the International MR-LINAC Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Delineation Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our network resulted in worse performance in terms of Dice compared to other tumor sites as reported by Sahiner et al [19], where the authors provide a comparison of CNN segmentations for different tumor/lesions (Dices: 0.51-0.92). However, lower performance for oropharyngeal tumor segmentation is consistent with what is known about the inter-observer variability for this subsite: Blinde et al [10] have shown differences in volume of up to 10 times among observers when segmenting OPSCC on MR, indicating the complexity of this task even for human observers. In this study, the mean Dice between our observers was 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our network resulted in worse performance in terms of Dice compared to other tumor sites as reported by Sahiner et al [19], where the authors provide a comparison of CNN segmentations for different tumor/lesions (Dices: 0.51-0.92). However, lower performance for oropharyngeal tumor segmentation is consistent with what is known about the inter-observer variability for this subsite: Blinde et al [10] have shown differences in volume of up to 10 times among observers when segmenting OPSCC on MR, indicating the complexity of this task even for human observers. In this study, the mean Dice between our observers was 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been published on automatic segmentation of primary tumors in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). Tumors in this category are quite variable in shape, size and location compared to other subsites in head and neck cancer and their delineation suffers from high interobserver variability [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this pilot study, we determined the impact of mpMRI input channel combinations (T2, T2+T1, T2+ADC, T2+Ktrans, T2+Ve, ALL) on DL model segmentation performance. Recent work has suggested that the average agreement between physicians measured in DSC for OPC tumor segmentation is exceptionally low [44]. Notably, compared to previous fully-automated primary tumor segmentation studies of HNSCC patients, we achieved promising average DSC performance (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The acceptability of segmentations used in a radiotherapy workflow is ultimately determined by physician judgment, with physician rating scales considered the gold standard for clinically relevant segmentation quality [51]. While subjective evaluation through rating scales is common in auto-segmentation studies, the established variability of OPC tumor segmentation between observers [44] highlights the difficulty in the interpretation of multi-observer segmentation quality analysis. Therefore, we implemented a comparative approach for each observer to determine if significant clinical differences were present between the ground truth segmentations and the corresponding segmentations of the best DL model (T2+T1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation