2016
DOI: 10.1130/b31337.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large igneous province or long-lived magmatic arc along the eastern margin of Australia during the Cretaceous? Insights from the sedimentary record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
75
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
12
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, sitespecific palaeoenvironmental, taphonomic, and geochronologic remain elusive (Tucker et al, , 2016. Therefore, these new assemblages lacked critical stratigraphic context to temporally co-occurring fossil assemblages described by Hocknull et al (2009) and Poropat et al (2015a,b), among others.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, sitespecific palaeoenvironmental, taphonomic, and geochronologic remain elusive (Tucker et al, , 2016. Therefore, these new assemblages lacked critical stratigraphic context to temporally co-occurring fossil assemblages described by Hocknull et al (2009) and Poropat et al (2015a,b), among others.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is reflected in the western portions of the basin, which experienced higher rates of subsidence, due to asymmetric loading as would be expected with thrust loading on the western side of the basin (Gallagher, 1990;Draper, 2002). Furthermore, association of a remnant volcanic arc (Whitsunday Volcanic Province) and late Mesozoic subduction margin along the east coast of Australia lends strong support to a retro-arc foreland basin model (Gallagher and Lambeck, 1989;Gallagher et al, 1994;Russell and Gurnis;1994;Veevers, 2000a,b;Tucker et al, 2016). This continental margin has been challenged by Bryan et al (2012, and references therein) as a possible S-LIP, and furthermore by Tucker et al (2016) as a progressive subduction margin.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations