2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an unbaffled stirred tank driven by a Rushton turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with data given by Alcamo et al (2005) for a single Rushton turbine in an unbaffled vessel, qualitative agreement is achieved, although higher values of radial velocity of up to 0.4 · u tip are obtained in this study. This might be an effect of the indirect baffling caused by the probes used in this study since the radial velocities obtained for the completely unbaffled BIOSTAT ® CultiBag 50L are more similar to data given in the literature [Alcamo et al (2005)]. In contrast, Delafosse et al (2008) and Kresta & Wood (1991) give maximum radial velocities in the stirrer discharge of up to 0.8 · u tip .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with data given by Alcamo et al (2005) for a single Rushton turbine in an unbaffled vessel, qualitative agreement is achieved, although higher values of radial velocity of up to 0.4 · u tip are obtained in this study. This might be an effect of the indirect baffling caused by the probes used in this study since the radial velocities obtained for the completely unbaffled BIOSTAT ® CultiBag 50L are more similar to data given in the literature [Alcamo et al (2005)]. In contrast, Delafosse et al (2008) and Kresta & Wood (1991) give maximum radial velocities in the stirrer discharge of up to 0.8 · u tip .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In the vicinity of the upper impeller, fluid velocities reach about 0.4 · u tip , but are significantly lower near the liquid surface. As described by Alcamo et al (2005), the jet of the RT has a slight downward inclination, which can be explained by the absence of baffles. In contrast, slight upwardly inclined radial jets have been found in experimental [Yianneskis et al (1987)] and numerical [Montante et al (2001)] studies on fully baffled vessels with Rushton turbines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The trailing vortex reportedly forms behind the blade for the unbaffled vessel. Its trajectory was similar to that for the baffled vessel (Alcamo et al, 2005). However, the rotation rate in that region might differ according to the baffle conditions.…”
Section: Velocity Profile Of the Liquid Flowmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Indeed, as shown by works of Alcamo et al [22], the flow in unbaffled stirred tank is more intensive in horizontal direction than in vertical one while, in baffled stirred tank, it is more intensive in vertical direction than in horizontal one. In the Nucleo TM bioreactor, it is twice intensive in horizontal direction than in vertical one however this latter remains significant.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Flow Structure Generated In Nucleo Tm Biormentioning
confidence: 91%