2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-bore Tunneled Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Patients with Coagulopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the last UK national guidelines were published in 2003 [13], there have been several disease‐specific and procedure‐specific national guidelines that have added more recommendations regarding when platelets should be given [14, 18, 19, 21]. In addition, further evidence from systematic reviews [26] and clinical studies [27, 28] has been published. Recommendations from these more recent guidelines, reviews and studies sometimes contradict the 2003 guideline making it difficult to determine which should be followed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the last UK national guidelines were published in 2003 [13], there have been several disease‐specific and procedure‐specific national guidelines that have added more recommendations regarding when platelets should be given [14, 18, 19, 21]. In addition, further evidence from systematic reviews [26] and clinical studies [27, 28] has been published. Recommendations from these more recent guidelines, reviews and studies sometimes contradict the 2003 guideline making it difficult to determine which should be followed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 2003 guidelines [13] recommend a threshold of 50 × 10 9 /l prior to an epidural anaesthetic, whereas a recent systematic review [26] recommends a threshold of 75–80 × 10 9 /l. The 2003 guidelines [13] also recommend a threshold of 50 × 10 9 /l prior to insertion of an indwelling central venous catheter, whereas two recent studies recommend a safe threshold of 20–25 × 10 9 /l [27, 28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have reported findings for the predictive value of test results for bleeding or the relationships between variables including clinical variables and coagulation test results for bleeding. Haas and colleagues 16 assessed a series of 361 patients with INR values of 1.5 to 2.0 who received a tunneled central venous catheter and did not find any significant bleeding in this group. Foster and coworkers 17 treated 40 liver transplant recipients with a total of 259 central venous catheter insertions.…”
Section: The Role Of Coagulation Tests In Predicting Bleeding Risk Fomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nearly all of these thoracic central lines were performed without pre-procedural correction of the thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy. In fact, attempted correction of hemostatic abnormalities in patients without active bleeding may incur greater risks than benefits 42,44,55. The diverse clinical conditions represented in these studies do not directly mirror our clinical situation, however, as few patients in these case series were septic and few proceduralists were EPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%