1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.121072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large band gap bowing of InxGa1−xN alloys

Abstract: Band gap measurements have been performed on strained InxGa1−xN epilayers with x⩽0.12. The experimental data indicate that the bowing of the band gap is much larger than commonly assumed. We have performed first-principles calculations for the band gap as a function of alloy composition and find that the bowing is strongly composition dependent. At x=0.125 the calculated bowing parameter is b=3.5 eV, in good agreement with the experimental values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent hybrid functional study based on the PBE0 XC functional found a slightly larger bowing parameter of 1.63 eV; however, the authors do note that PBE0 gives too wide band gaps in the low In region and that this likely leads to a too large bowing parameter. 73 Furthermore, as has been noted before, 48,91 we find that the bowing at low In content is much stronger than the "global bowing," indicating that a single bowing parameter is unable to accurately describe nonlinearities over the entire composition range. Evaluating the bowing parameter b at specific alloy compositions (see Table II 91 and consequently also in good agreement with the present results.…”
Section: B Band Bowing Of Ingan Alloysmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent hybrid functional study based on the PBE0 XC functional found a slightly larger bowing parameter of 1.63 eV; however, the authors do note that PBE0 gives too wide band gaps in the low In region and that this likely leads to a too large bowing parameter. 73 Furthermore, as has been noted before, 48,91 we find that the bowing at low In content is much stronger than the "global bowing," indicating that a single bowing parameter is unable to accurately describe nonlinearities over the entire composition range. Evaluating the bowing parameter b at specific alloy compositions (see Table II 91 and consequently also in good agreement with the present results.…”
Section: B Band Bowing Of Ingan Alloysmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…73 Furthermore, as has been noted before, 48,91 we find that the bowing at low In content is much stronger than the "global bowing," indicating that a single bowing parameter is unable to accurately describe nonlinearities over the entire composition range. Evaluating the bowing parameter b at specific alloy compositions (see Table II 91 and consequently also in good agreement with the present results. The good agreement with experimental studies, in addition to our tests comparing to SQS structures, indicates that the ordered structures investigated in the present study are an adequate model for the alloy.…”
Section: B Band Bowing Of Ingan Alloysmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…24,25 The red shift of the peak energy observed in the local CL spectra of Fig. 7 is an indication of the effective incorporation of In to the alloy in samples with a higher In content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also shown on this figure are some experimental data ͑labelled A͒ compiled from various sources, 23 and further experimental data ͑labelled B͒ valid for strained Ga 1Ϫx In x N grown on GaN, with xр0.12. 24 Note that there is a slight offset in the value of E g at xϭ0 due to our original GaN fit, but that the actual gradients are in good agreement for both alloys. Recent additional experimental results for small x 25,26 show similar trends.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 81%