2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1359-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

Abstract: In this study, laparoscopic appendectomy did not show a benefit over the open approach for obese patients with appendicitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
38
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results with regard to surgical and cosmetic outcomes and low cost are the important issues favoring open appendectomy (OA) [42]. Several retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy can decrease postoperative complications and wound infections, intra-abdominal abscesses are slightly increase after laparoscopy [10,12,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar results with regard to surgical and cosmetic outcomes and low cost are the important issues favoring open appendectomy (OA) [42]. Several retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy can decrease postoperative complications and wound infections, intra-abdominal abscesses are slightly increase after laparoscopy [10,12,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Authors discussed this variation from the inclusion criteria and decided to include the study as the number of patients less than 12 years unlikely to influence the overall outcomes of the meta-analysis in a significant manner. Sex distribution is described in five of the eight included studies [14,16,18,20,22] and the overall male to female ratio was similar (Table 1). Data from the retrospective studies varied from 1 year to 9-year period among the studies ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thirteen articles were scrutinized, of which, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven of these were retrospective cohort studies [14e17,20e22], one was a prospective randomized controlled trial [18] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a more recent comparative study no significant differences in terms of complications were found between the two groups (Clarke et al, 2011). We did not perform a separate analysis on overweight patients.…”
Section: Obese Patientsmentioning
confidence: 86%