2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04992.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: fad or future?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hrouda et al reviewed nine papers on LRC [28]. Among a total of 102 patients described in these nine papers, there were no instances of positive surgical margins or inadvertent incisions of the bladder.…”
Section: Surgical Marginsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Hrouda et al reviewed nine papers on LRC [28]. Among a total of 102 patients described in these nine papers, there were no instances of positive surgical margins or inadvertent incisions of the bladder.…”
Section: Surgical Marginsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A estos autores les siguieron otros que lentamente fueron perfeccionando las técnicas hasta llegar a la realización completa de la cirugía en forma intracorpórea 11 . Actualmente diversos centros alrededor del mundo, especializados en laparoscopia urológica avanzada, presentan series que promedian los 80 casos 7,12,13 . A su vez, existen grupos de investigación multicéntricos que se encuentran evaluando los resultados de este procedimiento a corto y largo plazo para poder determinar si existen concretas ventajas de realizar esta cirugía por vía laparoscópica 14 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Hrouda et al [18] reviewed the reported complications in the literature; in total there were few patients, but the complication rate appears to be similar to that of open surgery. In our data, there was a mortality rate of 2% (1/46), rectal injury rate of 0% (0/46), conversion rate of 0% (0/46), fistula formation rate of 2% (2/46) and intestinal obstruction rate of 4% (2/46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%