2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background To investigate the outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) compared to multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy (m-LA). Methods Studies comparing LESS-A with m-LA were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library before June 2020. Post-operative pain, resumption outcomes, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. We conducted meta-analyses using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects model. Subset analyses were conduct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional LESS techniques have been investigated with the goal of reducing postoperative pain, analgesic use, operative time, length of hospitalization, and blood loss. [12][13][14] A metanalysis of 9 LESS adrenalectomy studies demonstrated that patients undergoing LESS adrenalectomy reported better pain control and decreased length of hospitalization. However, the limited working space, external instrument clashing, and the cross handedness of LESS approaches have led to longer operative times than the conventional laparoscopic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional LESS techniques have been investigated with the goal of reducing postoperative pain, analgesic use, operative time, length of hospitalization, and blood loss. [12][13][14] A metanalysis of 9 LESS adrenalectomy studies demonstrated that patients undergoing LESS adrenalectomy reported better pain control and decreased length of hospitalization. However, the limited working space, external instrument clashing, and the cross handedness of LESS approaches have led to longer operative times than the conventional laparoscopic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%