1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-5387(00)87155-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanide thermodynamic predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, DyF 2 is not considered as thermodynamically stable; this result is in agreement with those obtained by Bratsch et al [19]. According to this diagram, DyF 3 should be electrochemically reduced into Dy, so the only predicted reaction is:…”
Section: Dyf 3 Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism On Inert Electrodesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…So, DyF 2 is not considered as thermodynamically stable; this result is in agreement with those obtained by Bratsch et al [19]. According to this diagram, DyF 3 should be electrochemically reduced into Dy, so the only predicted reaction is:…”
Section: Dyf 3 Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism On Inert Electrodesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Stability of the dihalides are governed in a similar way with decomposition via disproportionation, which is exothermic unless the ratio of the enthalpies of formation for LnX 3 versus LnX 2 is small (<1.5) [32, 40b] . The disproportionation pathway is more likely to be endothermic and therefore stabilize the Ln II state when I 3 is high (Figure 5), which is most likely for Eu, Sm and Yb [40b] . Based on this criterion the halide most likely to stabilize many Ln II ions (Ln = Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb) is the iodide ion, which will reduce the lattice energy of both tri‐ and divalent species and so the difference between these will become less significant, favoring the divalent ion, which is indeed reflected in the reported solid state structures [40c, 42] .…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the oxidation state IV is common for Ce, 36 the rather high reduction potential for Ce(IV)/Ce(III) (1.72 V) 34 Alternatively, comparisons can be made by considering the Ln 2+ Ln 3+ ionization energies (IE3), which generally correlate with the Ln 3+ /Ln 2+ reduction potentials. 37,38 Although usually a higher IE3 predicts a higher Ln 3+ /Ln 2+ reduction potential, there are deviations from this correlation. In particular, IE3[Yb] is ca.…”
Section: Reactions With Background Omentioning
confidence: 99%