1997
DOI: 10.1038/385432a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses

Abstract: There is considerable debate about whether the early processing of sounds depends on whether they form part of speech. Proponents of such speech specificity postulate the existence of language-dependent memory traces, which are activated in the processing of speech but not when equally complex, acoustic non-speech stimuli are processed. Here we report the existence of these traces in the human brain. We presented to Finnish subjects the Finnish phoneme prototype /e/ as the frequent stimulus, and other Finnish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

58
640
8
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,048 publications
(717 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
58
640
8
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the similarities between ERAN, RATN, MMN, and ELAN, these ERP components have been suggested as reflections of a highly adaptive, peri-sylvian system of auditory information processing (Koelsch et al, 2002(Koelsch et al, , 2001b, comprising the processing of single tones (Näätänen, 1992;Schröger, 1998), acoustic patterns (Schrö-ger, 1994, phonemes (Näätänen et al, 1997), tonal music (Koelsch et al, 2000b), and speech (Friederici, 1998). The early negativity elicited in the present experiment also appears to be part of this system, being most reminiscent to the ERAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the similarities between ERAN, RATN, MMN, and ELAN, these ERP components have been suggested as reflections of a highly adaptive, peri-sylvian system of auditory information processing (Koelsch et al, 2002(Koelsch et al, , 2001b, comprising the processing of single tones (Näätänen, 1992;Schröger, 1998), acoustic patterns (Schrö-ger, 1994, phonemes (Näätänen et al, 1997), tonal music (Koelsch et al, 2000b), and speech (Friederici, 1998). The early negativity elicited in the present experiment also appears to be part of this system, being most reminiscent to the ERAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is hypothesized that the successful processing of polysyllabic speech elements and recognizing differences between syllabic tokens is critical for speech comprehension. An electrophysiological correlate of the detection of a change in sensory stimuli exists in the form of the mismatch negativity (MMN), described by Näätänen (2001Näätänen ( , 2003 and colleagues (Näätänen et al, 1987(Näätänen et al, , 1997. The MMN provides a measure of the pre-attentive detection of a difference in the attributes of an infrequently presented "deviant" stimulus as compared to the stimulus properties represented in the memory trace of the frequently presented "standard" stimuli.…”
Section: Mismatch Field and Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the MMN response is greater in subjects for whom phonetic differences between stimuli cross a phoneme category boundary (Näätänen 2001) or is otherwise phonologically significant (Näätänen et al, 1997;Peltola et al, 2003;Winkler et al, 1990). As such, the MMN can be used to assess a subject's ability to detect change in linguistic stimuli.…”
Section: Mismatch Field and Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This component is sensitive to changes not only in the acoustic characteristics of auditory stimuli (Näätänen, Simpson, & Loveless, 1982), but also to their phonological properties (for a review, Pulvermüller & Shtyrov, 2006). For example, Näätänen and collaborators (Näätänen et al, 1997) demonstrated MMN responses to phoneme changes when Finnish listeners heard the Finnish vowel /ö/ or the unknown Estonian vowel /õ/ in a list composed predominantly of the Finnish vowel /e/. A larger MMN amplitude was found when the Finnish vowel /ö/ served as the deviant stimulus than when the unknown Estonian vowel /õ/ was presented as the deviant stimulus despite the fact that the acoustic distance of the unknown Estonian vowel /õ/ from /e/ was larger than that for the deviant Finnish vowel /ö/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%