2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language sensorimotor specificity modulates the motor system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One final caveat concerns the lack of intra-task stimulus distinctions in the PPT test. Previous research indicates that the motor system is differentially recruited by graspable vs. non-graspable nouns (Marino, Gallese, Buccino, & Riggio, 2012), with clear involvement for manipulable nouns (Marino, Gough, Gallese, Riggio, & Buccino, 2013) and no engagement for nouns lacking action associations (Aravena et al, 2014). Thus, the deficits observed in our patient groups on the PPT test may have been partly dragged by the dominant presence of manipulable objects.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…One final caveat concerns the lack of intra-task stimulus distinctions in the PPT test. Previous research indicates that the motor system is differentially recruited by graspable vs. non-graspable nouns (Marino, Gallese, Buccino, & Riggio, 2012), with clear involvement for manipulable nouns (Marino, Gough, Gallese, Riggio, & Buccino, 2013) and no engagement for nouns lacking action associations (Aravena et al, 2014). Thus, the deficits observed in our patient groups on the PPT test may have been partly dragged by the dominant presence of manipulable objects.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…This difference may be due to the fact that through photos the intrinsic features of objects, relevant for action, are immediately evident and specific (i.e., pertinent to the particular seen object) while through nouns these features are not related to specific objects but rather to a prototype of the class the objects belong to, most likely presented in a decontextualized fashion. It is worth stressing that even within language material it has been shown that the degree of sensorimotor specificity expressed by sentences affects how deeply the motor system is recruited during language processing (Marino et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the embodied cognition view, the representation of a concept is crucially dependent upon the sensory–motor properties belonging to that concept ( 7 9 ). Indeed, the hypothesis has been advanced that action verbs are mentally represented in different semantic representations among which the sensorimotor features to perform the action ( 10 12 ). This implies that the sensory–motor regions of the brain may also process action concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%