Language selection contributes to intrusion errors in speaking: Evidence from picture naming

Zheng, Xiaochen; Roelofs, Ardi; Lemhöfer, Kristin

doi:10.1017/s1366728919000683

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In mixed language blocks, however, they found the opposite pattern, with better overall L2 than L1 performance. The latter reversed language dominance effect has been observed in a number of language switching studies (e.g., Christoffels et al, 2016; Li & Gollan, 2018; Tabassi Mofrad et al, 2020; Stasenko et al, 2021; Verhoef et al, 2010; Wong & Maurer, 2021; Zheng, Roelofs, & Lemhöfer, 2020).…”

Section: Inhibitory Phenomena In Bilingual Language Productionmentioning

confidence: 59%

The concept of inhibition in bilingual control.

Declerck¹,

Koch²

2023

Psychological Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.

show abstract

Section: Inhibitory Phenomena In Bilingual Language Productionmentioning

confidence: 59%

The concept of inhibition in bilingual control.

Declerck¹,

Koch²

2023

Psychological Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At present, the language-switching paradigm (e.g., Declerck et al, 2012;Declerck et al, 2017;Zheng et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2020), picture-word interference task (e.g., Hermans et al, 1998;Costa et al, 2000;Boukadi et al 2016;Klaus & Lemhöfer, 2018) and read aloud task (e.g., Li & Gollan, 2018;Schotter et al, 2019) are mainly used in the behavioral study of bilingual language production. In this section, an explanatory introduction and comment will be made to illustrate the language-switching paradigm.…”

Section: Review Of Language Switching Paradigmmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review on Language Control of Bilingual Speech Production in Language Switching

Liu

2023

IJLLT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As bilinguals have increased in number these years, bilingual speech production (BSP) has become a hot topic in psycholinguistic research. The exploration of BSP can not only reveal the psychological mechanism of language processing but also help to understand the general mechanism of information selection in the human cognitive process. Language-switching has currently emerged as one of the primary research paradigms for studying multilingual speech production. Therefore, this paper summarizes several experimental designs of the language-switching paradigm, analyzes observations found in the experiments, summarizes the four theoretical models proposed in the previous literature, and finally puts forward possible future orientations on the basis of current research.

show abstract

“…However, it is also possible that switching frequency is predominantly induced by the conversational situation rather than the language situation in the society at large. Future studies may examine this possibility by manipulating the utility of voluntary switching by varying the frequency of monolingual or bilingual contextual cues (e.g., Zheng et al, 2020).…”

Section: Language Switching Motivationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voluntary and cued language switching in late bilingual speakers

Mooijman,

Schoonen,

Ruiter

et al. 2023

Bilingualism

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous research examining the factors that determine language choice and voluntary switching mainly involved early bilinguals. Here, using picture naming, we investigated language choice and switching in late Dutch–English bilinguals. We found that naming was overall slower in cued than in voluntary switching, but switch costs occurred in both types of switching. The magnitude of switch costs differed depending on the task and language, and was moderated by L2 proficiency. Self-rated rather than objectively assessed proficiency predicted voluntary switching and ease of lexical access was associated with language choice. Between-language and within-language switch costs were not correlated. These results highlight self-rated proficiency as a reliable predictor of voluntary switching, with language modulating switch costs. As in early bilinguals, ease of lexical access was related to word-level language choice of late bilinguals.

show abstract

Language selection contributes to intrusion errors in speaking: Evidence from picture naming

Cited by 4 publications

References 47 publications

The concept of inhibition in bilingual control.

The concept of inhibition in bilingual control.

A Review on Language Control of Bilingual Speech Production in Language Switching

Voluntary and cued language switching in late bilingual speakers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About