Annotation styles express guidelines that direct human annotators by explicitly stating the rules to follow when creating gold standard annotations of text corpora. These guidelines not only shape the gold standards they help create, but also influence the training and evaluation of Named Entity Linking (NEL) tools, since different annotation styles correspond to divergent views on the entities present in a document. Such divergence is particularly relevant for texts from the media domain containing references to creative works. This paper presents a corpus of 1000 annotated documents from sources such as Wikipedia, TVTropes and WikiNews that are organized in ten partitions. Each document contains multiple gold standard annotations representing various annotation styles. The corpus is used to evaluate a series of Named Entity Linking tools in order to understand the impact of the differences in annotation styles on the reported accuracy when processing highly ambiguous entities such as names of creative works. Relaxed annotation guidelines that include overlap styles, for instance, lead to better results across all tools.