2018
DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2018.1513028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language regulation in collaborative student writing: a case study

Abstract: The article provides a micro-analytical perspective on processes of collaborative writing among university students at an international BA programme in Denmark, investigating the extent to which language regulation takes place as part of the students' joint writing activities and exploring the language ideological underpinnings of such regulatory practices. Four overall analytical observations are made concerning the practices of the group: 1) Writing is a multilingual process; 2) Written products are monoling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Language teachers are forced to provide their students chances for practicing their collaborative and critical thinking through short story collaborative writing instruction. (Chen & Yu, 2019;Mortensen, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Language teachers are forced to provide their students chances for practicing their collaborative and critical thinking through short story collaborative writing instruction. (Chen & Yu, 2019;Mortensen, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, collaborative writing promotes positive writing attitudes and behaviors. This positive advancement contributes for the 21 st century capacity (Chen & Yu, 2019;Mortensen, 2019). During short story writing, students works collaboratively and show active participation, productive contribution in writing, flexible and compromised argumentation, good writing management, and respectful behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…She was able to regulate her own language after her attention is indirectly brought to the possible error. This brief exchange, as noted by Mortensen (2018), amounts to a clear example of language regulation, in this case, self-repair.…”
Section: Extractmentioning
confidence: 87%