2020
DOI: 10.21272/ftrk.2020.12(2)-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Milton-model Analysis in Political Discourse

Abstract: The article is dedicated to the analysis of the verbal influence (also known as suggestion) realization phenomenon in political discourse, which is usually understood as a holistic combined image of the text (be it an advertisement slogan, a political program, a speech, or an interview) itself and the emotions of its recipient and addressee. and is aimed at a a political subject’s (politics, political force, power) influencing a political object (audience, electorate, voter). The political discourse is studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that, unfortunately, there are currently very few studies of PSYOPS, carried out with the involvement of the latest synthetic scientific directions, within which there would be a comprehensive approach to the analysis of their communicative phenomena (including the psychological, neurophysiological, social, linguistic parameters) which would consider an end-to-end influence of all interactives. To the list of such sciences, firstly, one should include Neurolinguistic Programming, Suggestive Linguistics, Profiling, Spin-Doctoring and others, which will form the theoretical basis of the research, including the newest direction of Spin-Suggestology, presented in the author's previous works, which is aimed at identifying, classifying and neutralizing or minimizing the negative impact of PSYOPS (see 7,8,9,10,11). It should also be noted that the criterion of most PSYOPS classifications is first of all based on their local or purely technical dominance, but the qualification of the actual linguistic component as the information destruction dominant, determining its suggestive specificity, which would enable the identification of pathogenic elements of such information, and thus possibility of reduction, neutralization or at least minimization of its consequences, is usually left out of the frame.…”
Section: сучасні іпсо: структура комунікативної патогенностіmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that, unfortunately, there are currently very few studies of PSYOPS, carried out with the involvement of the latest synthetic scientific directions, within which there would be a comprehensive approach to the analysis of their communicative phenomena (including the psychological, neurophysiological, social, linguistic parameters) which would consider an end-to-end influence of all interactives. To the list of such sciences, firstly, one should include Neurolinguistic Programming, Suggestive Linguistics, Profiling, Spin-Doctoring and others, which will form the theoretical basis of the research, including the newest direction of Spin-Suggestology, presented in the author's previous works, which is aimed at identifying, classifying and neutralizing or minimizing the negative impact of PSYOPS (see 7,8,9,10,11). It should also be noted that the criterion of most PSYOPS classifications is first of all based on their local or purely technical dominance, but the qualification of the actual linguistic component as the information destruction dominant, determining its suggestive specificity, which would enable the identification of pathogenic elements of such information, and thus possibility of reduction, neutralization or at least minimization of its consequences, is usually left out of the frame.…”
Section: сучасні іпсо: структура комунікативної патогенностіmentioning
confidence: 99%