2010
DOI: 10.1080/02687030902775157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language, meaning, context, and functional communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This expression of the narrator's attitudes and opinions creates interpersonal meaning (Armstrong & Ferguson, 2010). The narrator expresses his/her attitudes and opinions through narrative by (1) selecting to tell only those stories deemed to be significant or "worth telling"; and (2) highlighting or adding prominence to select information within the narrative to make one's point.…”
Section: Events Set In Past Timementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This expression of the narrator's attitudes and opinions creates interpersonal meaning (Armstrong & Ferguson, 2010). The narrator expresses his/her attitudes and opinions through narrative by (1) selecting to tell only those stories deemed to be significant or "worth telling"; and (2) highlighting or adding prominence to select information within the narrative to make one's point.…”
Section: Events Set In Past Timementioning
confidence: 98%
“…These functions include both the referential function of narratives and the evaluative function, which entail coherence of both referential and evaluative content. In sum, language is one set of meaningmaking resources (Armstrong & Ferguson, 2010) that combines with other resources to achieve communicative functions through discourse.…”
Section: Discourse Coherence As a Basis For Communicative Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each factor is the focal point of a relation, or function that operates between the message and the factor. The functions are: referential, emotive, conative, phatic, poetic, and metalingual [12]. Rhetorical theory focuses on the techniques of using language effectively and persuasively in spoken form [13].…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of talk time of people with aphasia in everyday life has high verisimiltude, as it is the direct measurement of the actual behaviour being investigated. The verbal communication people use in everyday life is highly contextualised and inherently different from that used in the therapy room (Armstrong & Mortensen, 2006;Armstrong & Ferguson, 2010). Communication may be with a number of different communication partners, for many purposes and in many environments.…”
Section: Use Of Talk Time As An Assessment For People With Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%