2009
DOI: 10.1080/14790710902878692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language learning experience in school context and metacognitive awareness of multilingual children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The multilingual benefit in language learning and mathematical learning The rationale behind looking for an association between language learning and mathematical learning is that most of the benefits identified in the literature relate to a range of skills and abilities which are relevant for learning as a general cognitive activity, and are therefore relevant to both language learning and mathematical learning. Some of these include cognitive flexibility and problem-solving (Bialystok, 1999;Bialystok & Majumder, 1998;Leikin, 2013;Ricciardelli, 1992Ricciardelli, , 1993, attention and monitoring processes (Bialystok, Craik, & Ryan, 2006), learning strategies (Bochner, 1996;Kemp, 2007) and metacognitive awareness (Le Pichon Vorstman, De Swart, Ceginskas, & Van Den Bergh, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multilingual benefit in language learning and mathematical learning The rationale behind looking for an association between language learning and mathematical learning is that most of the benefits identified in the literature relate to a range of skills and abilities which are relevant for learning as a general cognitive activity, and are therefore relevant to both language learning and mathematical learning. Some of these include cognitive flexibility and problem-solving (Bialystok, 1999;Bialystok & Majumder, 1998;Leikin, 2013;Ricciardelli, 1992Ricciardelli, , 1993, attention and monitoring processes (Bialystok, Craik, & Ryan, 2006), learning strategies (Bochner, 1996;Kemp, 2007) and metacognitive awareness (Le Pichon Vorstman, De Swart, Ceginskas, & Van Den Bergh, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several empirical studies (McLaughlin & Nayak, ; Nation & McLaughlin, ; Nayak et al) have also suggested that when people learn an L2, they learn the process of language learning. Thus, people with previous language experience have more resources to devote to the form of the new language because they have a heightened metalinguistic awareness (e.g., Le Pichon–Vorstman et al, ). Controlled processes require a heavier cognitive load than automatic processes (VanPatten, ), and multiple language learning experiences help controlled processes move to automated processes more quickly.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies have found that bilinguals possess better metacognitive awareness, due to their dual language management (e.g., Adesope et al, 2010, Ransdell et al, 2006Vorstman et al, 2009), others found monolinguals are better (e.g., Schoonen et al, 2003). These mixed findings may be due to the specific aspects of metacognition examined.…”
Section: Metacognitive Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%