2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1221.2007.tb00028.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language History for Teaching and Learning German

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrating PG into the language classroom brings many benefits: Learners gain deeper insight into the target language and culture, as well as the notions of language and culture themselves. Knowing how language develops can reduce frustration about seemingly illogical grammar rules (Lightfoot, , pp. 34‐35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating PG into the language classroom brings many benefits: Learners gain deeper insight into the target language and culture, as well as the notions of language and culture themselves. Knowing how language develops can reduce frustration about seemingly illogical grammar rules (Lightfoot, , pp. 34‐35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these changes were the Second Germanic Sound Shift and various semantic shifts. Since then, several scholars have echoed these claims (Crawford, 1988; Horsford, 1987; Lightfoot, 2007; Wolff, 1993), suggesting that historical instruction would placate the feeling of “foreignness.” While Arteaga & Herschensohn (1995) found that explicit historical instruction on the French circumflex aided the learning of English–French loanwords, to date, no empirical studies have examined the effects of receiving historical instruction on the learning of English–German cognates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the German verb “sterben [to die]” is cognate with the English verb “to starve.” Although “starve” originally meant “to die” (Old English “steorfan [to die]”), throughout the history of the English language, its meaning narrowed semantically to refer to a specific type of death (i.e., death by hunger). While associative and semantic elaboration (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Craik & Tulving, 1975) have been shown to have positive effects on memory and learning (Bolger & Zapata, 2011; Hulstijn, 2001; Kirsch, 2012; McNamara & Scott, 2001; Prince, 2012) and scholars have been calling for the use of historical instruction in the German L2 classroom for quite some time (Horsford, 1987; Lightfoot, 2007; Smith, 1968; Wolff, 1993), to date, no empirical studies have tested the effects of explicit historical instruction on the learning of English–German cognates. Declarative knowledge of these historical changes may allow English‐speaking L2 learners of German to create an instant connection between English and German cognates, while also providing them with a tool kit to correctly predict the meaning of cognates they have not encountered before.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further discussion on linguistic bias of different types of speakers, see Lightfoot (, pp. 35‐37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the discussion in Lightfoot (, pp. 35‐41) is useful here, as well as Barbour and Stevenson ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%