2005
DOI: 10.1007/11526018_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Generation for Conversational Agent by Evolution of Plan Trees with Genetic Programming

Abstract: Abstract. As dialogue systems are widely demanded, the research on natural language generation in dialogue has raised interest. Contrary to conventional dialogue systems that reply to the user with a set of predefined answers, a newly developed dialogue system generates them dynamically and trains answers to support more flexible and customized dialogues with humans. The paper proposes an evolutionary method for generating sentences using interactive genetic programming. Sentence plan trees, which stand for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the fifth criterion would be: The sixth criterion is the adaptative-evolution possibilities. It has been included from the inspiration of reading the work of Liebermen [55], in which he claimed that autonomous agents can show adaptive and evolution possibilities, i.e., the agent adapts its behavior to each student, and learns how to evolve to interact better depending on previous interactions [56][57][58][59]. PCAs may not have either adaptive or evolution possibilities as in 6.1, to have adaptive possibilities to modify their dialogue and/or gestures to the student as in 6.2, to have evolution possibilities and to learn from the previous sentences of the dialogue to generate different interactions (verbal and or non-verbal) as in 6.3, and even to have adaptive and evolution possibilities so that from the learning of previous and present interactions the behavior and/or dialogue of the agent changes as in 6.4.…”
Section: Human-computer Interaction Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the fifth criterion would be: The sixth criterion is the adaptative-evolution possibilities. It has been included from the inspiration of reading the work of Liebermen [55], in which he claimed that autonomous agents can show adaptive and evolution possibilities, i.e., the agent adapts its behavior to each student, and learns how to evolve to interact better depending on previous interactions [56][57][58][59]. PCAs may not have either adaptive or evolution possibilities as in 6.1, to have adaptive possibilities to modify their dialogue and/or gestures to the student as in 6.2, to have evolution possibilities and to learn from the previous sentences of the dialogue to generate different interactions (verbal and or non-verbal) as in 6.3, and even to have adaptive and evolution possibilities so that from the learning of previous and present interactions the behavior and/or dialogue of the agent changes as in 6.4.…”
Section: Human-computer Interaction Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agents and advances in Natural Language Processing could improve the interaction with the students showing more complex animation, so that agents become able to adapt their conversation and behavior to the conversation and behavior to the students [57,58,61].…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EAs can provide solutions to some of those problems. For instance, EAs can generate: text structures for discourse planning (Karamanis & Manurung, 2002); referring expressions (Hervás & Gervás, 2005); and, dialogues (Kim et al 2004;Lim & Cho, 2005).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was taken by Lim & Cho (2005) with the same goal than Kim et al (2004): improving the response adaptability in conversational agents by responding with sentences constructed through an evolutionary process. The fitness is also evaluated according to how natural the user thinks that the queries are.…”
Section: Approach 2: Use Of Sentence Plan Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation