2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0959269518000236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Death and Subject Expression: First-person-singular subjects in a declining dialect of Louisiana French

Abstract: Louisiana French is undergoing gradual language death. In such situations, it is common to find increased variability and rapid change, as speakers use the language less often and in fewer domains (Wolfram 2004; Palosaari and Campbell 2011). These processes have been observed in the pronominal system of Louisiana French (Rottet 1996; Girard 2013), with both phonological and morphological sources of variation leading to an exceptionally large inventory of first-person-singular forms in the French of the Pointe-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence presented here demonstrates that stylistic variation remains identifiable among the last remaining speakers of a threatened language that has suffered acute domain loss, and adds support to studies showing similar tendencies in the case of "dialect death" too (e.g. Carmichael 2017;Carmichael and Gudmestad 2019). While not appropriate for every context without modification (see Blainey 2017), this article has also demonstrated that the adoption of standard variationist methods constitute a useful heuristic tool for a more robust analysis of variation across the entire stylistic range among speakers of threatened languages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The evidence presented here demonstrates that stylistic variation remains identifiable among the last remaining speakers of a threatened language that has suffered acute domain loss, and adds support to studies showing similar tendencies in the case of "dialect death" too (e.g. Carmichael 2017;Carmichael and Gudmestad 2019). While not appropriate for every context without modification (see Blainey 2017), this article has also demonstrated that the adoption of standard variationist methods constitute a useful heuristic tool for a more robust analysis of variation across the entire stylistic range among speakers of threatened languages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The patterns in Figures 1 and 2 echo some previous findings and challenge others. To begin with, we identified the same twelve forms that occurred in data elicited from a translation task in Carmichael and Gudmestad (2019), suggesting internal validity of this dataset and the particular forms that are in common use in this community regardless of task type. We also see many of the variants identified in previous work on Louisiana French, although the rates at which they appear differ in various ways.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Twelve 1sg subject forms have been documented in the variety of Louisiana French spoken in Terrebonne and Lafourche Parishes (Carmichael & Gudmestad, 2019). Phonological variation in the clitic pronoun je 'I' includes realization as [ʒə] or [ʃə], as in other varieties of French, and less common allophones [sə], [zə], and [hə].…”
Section: Subject Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%