2013
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.53.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Areas Involving the Inferior Temporal Cortex on Intraoperative Mapping in a Bilingual Patient With Glioblastoma

Abstract: Fig. 1 Upper row: T 1 -weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images with gadolinium showing a small ring-enhanced mass in the left superior temporal lobe. Lower row: T 2 -weighted MR images revealing the presence of a hyperintense area in the temporal lobe measuring 6 cm in maximal diameter. 256 CASE REPORT AbstractA 40-year-old bilingual man underwent removal of glioblastoma multiforme with intraoperative language mapping, mainly using the picture-naming and auditory responsive-naming tasks under cortical stimula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Połczyñska et al (2016) assessed only one of the languages used most frequently by the patient (L3) via a composite test battery; for L1, L2, and L4 only a naming test was used. In two studies (Kin et al, 2013;Sierpowska et al, 2018) L1 was tested in a variety of tasks, while other languages were either not assessed at all (Kin et al, 2013), or were assessed only through the tasks that were going to be used intraoperatively (Sierpowska et al, 2018). In two studies (Cervenka et al, 2011;Sierpowska et al, 2013) authors only assessed the language for which standardized tests were available.…”
Section: Preoperative Language Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Połczyñska et al (2016) assessed only one of the languages used most frequently by the patient (L3) via a composite test battery; for L1, L2, and L4 only a naming test was used. In two studies (Kin et al, 2013;Sierpowska et al, 2018) L1 was tested in a variety of tasks, while other languages were either not assessed at all (Kin et al, 2013), or were assessed only through the tasks that were going to be used intraoperatively (Sierpowska et al, 2018). In two studies (Cervenka et al, 2011;Sierpowska et al, 2013) authors only assessed the language for which standardized tests were available.…”
Section: Preoperative Language Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies did not report any information on postoperative assessment (Bello et al, 2006;Cervenka et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2013;Połczyñska et al, 2016). In seven studies the postoperative assessment was restricted to language (Roux and Trémoulet, 2002;Lubrano et al, 2004;Roux et al, 2004;Borius et al, 2012;Kin et al, 2013;Gao et al, 2016). In one study (de Macêdo Filho et al, 2020) a complete neurologic examination and the language assessment were performed only after surgery but no information was provided.…”
Section: General Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation