Purpose: Human Vα24 natural killer T (NKT) cells bearing an invariant Vα24JαQ antigen receptor, the counterpart of murine Vα14 NKT cells, are activated by a specific ligand, α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer, KRN7000), in a CD1d-dependent manner. I.v. administration of αGalCer-pulsed dendritic cells (DC) induces significant activation and expansion of Vα14 NKT cells in the lung and resulting potent antitumor activities in mouse tumor metastatic models. We did a phase I dose escalation study with αGalCer-pulsed DCs in lung cancer patients. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer or recurrent lung cancer received i.v. injections of αGalCer-pulsed DCs (level 1: 5 × 107/m2; level 2: 2.5 × 108/m2; and level 3: 1 × 109/m2) to test the safety, feasibility, and clinical response. Immunomonitoring was also done in all completed cases. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled in this study. No severe adverse events were observed during this study in any patient. After the first and second injection of αGalCer-pulsed DCs, dramatic increase in peripheral blood Vα24 NKT cells was observed in one case and significant responses were seen in two cases receiving the level 3 dose. No patient was found to meet the criteria for partial or complete responses, whereas two cases in the level 3 group remained unchanged for more than a year with good quality of life. Conclusions: In this clinical trial, αGalCer-pulsed DC administration was well tolerated and could be safely done even in patients with advanced disease.
) to test the safety, feasibility, and clinical response of this therapeutic strategy. Immunomonitoring was also done in all cases. Results: Six patients were enrolled in this study. No severe adverse events were observed during this study in any patients. After the first and second injection of activated Va24 NKT cells, an increased number of peripheral blood Va24 NKT cells was observed in two of three cases receiving a level 2 dose of activated Va24 NKT cells. The number of IFN-g-producing cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased after the administration of activatedVa24 NKT cells in all three cases receiving the level 2 dose. No patient was found to meet the criteria for either a partial or a complete response. Conclusions:The clinical trial with activatedVa24 NKTcell administration was well tolerated and carried out safely with minor adverse events even in patients with advanced diseases.
Bradykinin (BK) is produced and acts at the site of injury and inflammation. In the CNS, migration of microglia toward the lesion site plays an important role pathologically. In the present study, we investigated the effect of BK on microglial migration. Increased motility of cultured microglia was mimicked by B 1 receptor agonists and markedly inhibited by a B 1 antagonist , but not by a B 2 receptor antagonist. BK induced chemotaxis in microglia isolated from wild-type and B 2 -knock-out mice but not from B 1 -knock-out mice. BK-induced motility was not blocked by pertussis toxin but was blocked by chelating intracellular Ca 2ϩ or by low extracellular Ca 2ϩ , implying that Ca 2ϩ influx is prerequisite. Blocking the reverse mode of Na ϩ /Ca 2ϩ exchanger (NCX) completely inhibited BK-induced migration. The involvement of NCX was further confirmed by using NCX ϩ/Ϫ mice; B 1 -agonist-induced motility and chemotaxis was decreased compared with that in NCX ϩ/ϩ mice. Activation of NCX seemed to be dependent on protein kinase C and phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and resultant activation of intermediate-conductance (IK-type) Ca 2ϩ -dependent K ϩ currents (I K(Ca) ) was activated. Despite these effects, BK did not activate microglia, as judged from OX6 staining. Using in vivo lesion models and pharmacological injection to the brain, it was shown that microglial accumulation around the lesion was also dependent on B 1 receptors and I K(Ca) . These observations support the view that BK functions as a chemoattractant by using the distinct signal pathways in the brain and, thus, attracts microglia to the lesion site in vivo.
Purpose Whereas whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the standard treatment of brain metastases (BMs), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly preferred to avoid cognitive dysfunction; however, it has not been clearly determined whether treatment with SRS is as effective as that with WBRT or WBRT plus SRS. We thus assessed the noninferiority of salvage SRS to WBRT in patients with BMs. Patients and Methods Patients age 20 to 79 years old with performance status scores of 0 to 2-and 3 if caused only by neurologic deficits-and with four or fewer surgically resected BMs with only one lesion > 3 cm in diameter were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to WBRT or salvage SRS arms within 21 days of surgery. The primary end point was overall survival. A one-sided α of .05 was used. Results Between January 2006 and May 2014, 137 and 134 patients were enrolled in the WBRT and salvage SRS arms, respectively. Median overall survival was 15.6 months in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.05; 90% CI, 0.83 to 1.33; one-sided P for noninferiority = .027). Median intracranial progression-free survival of patients in the WBRT arm (10.4 months) was longer than that of patients in the salvage SRS arm (4.0 months). The proportions of patients whose Mini-Mental Status Examination and performance status scores that did not worsen at 12 months were similar in both arms; however, 16.4% of patients in the WBRT arm experienced grade 2 to 4 cognitive dysfunction after 91 days postenrollment, whereas only 7.7% of those in the SRS arm did ( P = .048). Conclusion Salvage SRS is noninferior to WBRT and can be established as a standard therapy for patients with four or fewer BMs.
A pilot study was performed to investigate the safety and feasibility of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccines (AFTV) and the clinical responses to these vaccines by glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Twelve primary GBM patients were recruited. Eight had recurrent disease while four had been treated for primary disease but retained a visible tumor mass. AFTV were prepared from formalin-fixed and/or paraffin-embedded tumor tissue obtained upon surgery and premixed with original adjuvant materials. The patients were given three five-site intradermal inoculations at weekly intervals. A delayed-type hypersensitivity test was performed before and after each vaccination. In addition, the tumor tissues were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis to determine whether MIB-1, p53, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class-I complex expression could predict the response to the treatment. The treatment was well tolerated, with only local erythema, induration, and low-grade fever being reported. Of the 12 patients, one showed a complete response, one showed a partial response, two showed minor responses, one had stable disease, and seven exhibited progressive disease. The median survival period was 10.7 months from the initiation of the AFTV treatment but three of the five responders survived for 20 months or more after AFTV inoculation. Low p53 and high MHC class-I expression by the tumor may help predict the efficacy of this therapy. Thus, the AFTV is safe and feasible, and could significantly improve the outcome of GBM. Further clinical investigations to confirm this are highly desirable.
Recent sequencing studies demonstrated the MYD88 L265P mutation in more than 70% of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL), and the clinical significance of this mutation has been proposed as diagnostic and prognostic markers in PCNSL. In contrast, mutational analyses using cell‐free DNAs have been reported in a variety of systemic lymphomas. To investigate how sensitively the MYD88 L265P mutation can be identified in cell‐free DNA from PCNSL patients, we carried out droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and targeted deep sequencing (TDS) in 14 consecutive PCNSL patients from whom paired tumor‐derived DNA and cell‐free DNA was available at diagnosis. The MYD88 L265P mutation was found in tumor‐derived DNA from all 14 patients (14/14, 100%). In contrast, among 14 cell‐free DNAs evaluated by ddPCR (14/14) and TDS (13/14), the MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in eight out of 14 (ddPCR) and in 0 out of 13 (TDS) samples, implying dependence on the detection method. After chemotherapy, the MYD88 L265P mutation in cell‐free DNAs was traced in five patients; unexpectedly, the mutations disappeared after chemotherapy was given, and they remained undetectable in all patients. These observations suggest that ddPCR can sensitively detect the MYD88 L265P mutation in cell‐free DNA and could be used as non‐invasive diagnostics, but may not be applicable for monitoring minimal residual diseases in PCNSL.
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have recently been identified as early and frequent genetic alterations in astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and oligoastrocytomas, as well as secondary glioblastomas, whereas primary glioblastomas very rarely contain IDH1 mutations. Furthermore, a specific monoclonal antibody, IMab-1, which recognizes IDH1-R132H-the most frequent IDH1 mutation-has been generated. IMab-1 has been reported to react with the IDH1-R132H protein, but not the wild-type IDH1 or the other IDH1 mutant proteins in Western-blot analysis. However, the importance of immunohistochemistry using IMab-1 has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we compared the findings from IMab-1 immunohistochemistry and direct DNA sequencing using 49 glioma samples. IMab-1 detected 12 out of 49 cases; however, only nine cases were found to be IDH1-R132H by direct DNA sequencing because of a small population of IDH1-R132H mutation-possessing tumor cells, indicating that IMab-1 immunohistochemistry is useful for detecting IDH1-R132H. We conducted immunohistochemical detection in 52 cases of grade III astrocytomas. The median time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer in the cases with the IDH1 mutation (86.7 months) compared to the cases without the IDH1 mutation (wild type, 10.4 months) (p < 0.01). In conclusion, the anti-IDH1-R132H-specific monoclonal antibody IMab-1 is very useful for detecting IDH1-R132H in immunohistochemistry, and predicting the time to progression in grade III anaplastic astrocytomas. Therefore, IMab-1 is likely to be useful for the diagnosis of mutation-bearing gliomas and for determining the treatment strategy of grade III gliomas.
Object Temozolomide (TMZ) may enhance antitumor immunity in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). In this paper the authors report on a prospective Phase I/IIa clinical trial of fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) concomitant with TMZ therapy, followed by treatment with autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) and TMZ maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Methods Twenty-four patients (age 16–75 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 60% before initiation of FRT) with newly diagnosed GBM received a total dose of 60 Gy of FRT with daily concurrent TMZ. After a 4-week interval, the patients received 3 AFTV injections and the first course of TMZ maintenance chemotherapy for 5 days, followed by multiple courses of TMZ for 5 days in each 28-day cycle. Results This treatment regimen was well tolerated by all patients. The percentage of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) ≥ 24 months was 33%. The median PFS, median overall survival (OS), and the actuarial 2- and 3-year survival rates of the 24 patients were 8.2 months, 22.2 months, 47%, and 38%, respectively. The median PFS in patients with a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response after the third AFTV injection (DTH-2) of 10 mm or larger surpassed the median length of follow-up for progression-free patients (29.5 months), which was significantly greater than the median PFS in patients with a smaller DTH-2 response. Conclusions The treatment regimen was well tolerated and resulted in favorable PFS and OS for newly diagnosed GBM patients. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000001426 (UMIN clinical trials registry, Japan).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.