2017
DOI: 10.5294/laclil.2017.10.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and Content in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those perception results from the learners that did not consider CLIL effective in many of the questions from the survey may be influenced by those two factors. Consequently, as Mcdougald (2017) suggested, few firm conclusions can be drawn in this research field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those perception results from the learners that did not consider CLIL effective in many of the questions from the survey may be influenced by those two factors. Consequently, as Mcdougald (2017) suggested, few firm conclusions can be drawn in this research field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further, second language (L2) learners thought that, by using CBI, the class was challenging since they had to pay attention not only to the language but also to the content that was the focus of the course (Vergara et al, 2016). Mcdougald (2017) determined areas that would provide all practitioners with a starting point to reflect on when considering how to approach language and content in the classroom. First, content area: educators must be well-versed in the content subject area that they teach.…”
Section: Content-based Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation