Landscape Projection and Its Technological Use in Conceptualising Places and Architecture

Abstract

The manipulation of landscape and the technological use of its views can be a strategy for place-making and a way of creating architecture and making it original. The methods used for this can be different, for example, by mechanically revealing and obscuring views, optical or film projection, directing the viewer to specific frames, using mirrors, etc. This approach is alternative and somewhat in opposition to the natural incorporation of the object into the landscape. In modernism, different architectural views of the surroundings were tested and used differently. These experiences are now transposed to contemporary architectural objects thanks to technological developments and the scenographic shaping of space. The article refers to the sources of transferring landscape views in popular dioramas and the effects of the development of photography, cinematography, and IT media. It describes the possible consequences of perceiving such a created landscape and more general — the world. An example of such a means of expression being fully and consciously taken is the now-defunct Charles de Beistegui Paris apartment. It was designed by Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret in 1929–1931. The apartment was selected for analysing as a case study and confronted with contemporary realisations that use various creative techniques involving the landscape.

Architectural and Urban Changes in a Residential Environment—Implications for Design Science

“…The various sensory means allowed for a multi-perspective view of the place and its interpretation, which was sometimes not obvious at the outset [92]. However, pictorial representations do not enable one to experience a place as much as authentically being in it [93]. In the development of smart cities, Camboim et al believe that management capable of integrating techno-economic activities, the configuration of the urban environment, and the socio-institutional structure is responsible for the level of transformation [30].…”