2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02573.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum)

Abstract: The field of landscape genetics has great potential to identify habitat features that influence population genetic structure. To identify landscape correlates of genetic differentiation in a quantitative fashion, we developed a novel approach using geographical information systems analysis. We present data on blotched tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum) from 10 sites across the northern range of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Wyoming, USA. We used eight microsatellite loci to analyse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
271
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
16
271
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These numbers, from very different sites with very different ecological conditions, suggest that movement among breeding sites is quite common in this species, and that the precise philopatry that is often ascribed to Ambystoma salamanders (Gamble et al 2007) may not hold for A. californiense. Interestingly, we found no evidence for isolationby-distance, which often occurs in amphibian systems (Funk et al 2005;Spear et al 2005;Wang et al 2009;Wang and Summers 2010). However, pairwise estimates of F ST among our ponds are consistent with estimates of gene flow and genetic clustering.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These numbers, from very different sites with very different ecological conditions, suggest that movement among breeding sites is quite common in this species, and that the precise philopatry that is often ascribed to Ambystoma salamanders (Gamble et al 2007) may not hold for A. californiense. Interestingly, we found no evidence for isolationby-distance, which often occurs in amphibian systems (Funk et al 2005;Spear et al 2005;Wang et al 2009;Wang and Summers 2010). However, pairwise estimates of F ST among our ponds are consistent with estimates of gene flow and genetic clustering.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…While most conservation genetics studies have focused on the importance of maintaining connectivity among populations, few have considered the ecological conditions necessary to maintain viable effective population sizes. Population connectivity is clearly important, both for sustaining genetic diversity and the complex source-sink dynamics that characterize many natural populations (Trenham et al 2001;Manel et al 2003;Storfer et al 2007;Spear et al 2005;Wang et al 2009). However, genetic diversity can also be protected by maintaining adequate effective population sizes Charlesworth and Willis 2009;Wang 2009a), and this may be particularly important as landscapes become fragmented and gene flow is interrupted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The F ST values obtained were higher than those documented in other fine-scale salamander studies (Cabe et al, 2007;Zamudio and Wieczorek, 2007;Purrenhage et al, 2009) and frog island populations (Lind et al, 2010), but showed similar levels of divergence to other amphibian population genetic studies covering larger regions (Spear et al, 2005;Savage et al, 2010). The similarities in genetic diversity and demographics among island and coastal populations (Table 1; Figure 3) underscore their similar histories, despite the current differences in connectivity to the mainland.…”
Section: Island Isolation Vs Seawater Colonizationmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Throughout the development of landscape genetics, amphibians are at the forefront for detecting landscape barriers due to their commonly known characteristics of low vagility and high philopatry (Crosby et al., 2009; Cushman, 2006; Murphy et al., 2010; Spear, Peterson, Matocq, & Storfer, 2005). Often these two attributes influence the expectations regarding their patterns of genetic differentiation and prompt assumptions about landscape features that act as barriers to their subpopulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%