2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00198.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landholding Patterns in Early Islamic Egypt

Abstract: This article examines the impact of the Arab conquests of the 630s and 640s on rural society and fiscal organization in Egypt. Traditional accounts paint a picture of a seventh‐century Egypt from which the aristocracy had largely disappeared and in which Arab rulers and administrators communicated directly with village communities. Drawing upon the testimony of seventh‐century documentary papyri, this essay reveals the continued role of Christian elites in administering tax collection and the extent to which t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Egyptian evidence is even more detailed. Legendre 2016, and Sijpesteijn 2009, demonstrate that, during the initial 60 to 80 years after the conquest, the occupation of the countryside by Muslims was either forbidden (under Umar I, d. 644), or limited to the Delta. During this period, the conquerors' elite claiming territorial leadership administered the Egyptian countryside from their capital Fustat, employing local agents, the dukes (an office attested during pre-Islamic times), for tax collection at the village level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egyptian evidence is even more detailed. Legendre 2016, and Sijpesteijn 2009, demonstrate that, during the initial 60 to 80 years after the conquest, the occupation of the countryside by Muslims was either forbidden (under Umar I, d. 644), or limited to the Delta. During this period, the conquerors' elite claiming territorial leadership administered the Egyptian countryside from their capital Fustat, employing local agents, the dukes (an office attested during pre-Islamic times), for tax collection at the village level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument is that Arabs were more likely to settle in areas that were closer to 'Arish. In these areas, the argument goes, Arabs were more likely to replace Coptic local elites as large landholders and headmen (Sijpesteijn 2009), and hence to impose a higher poll tax rate (or enforce the tax more strictly) on Coptic taxpayers. By contrast, in areas where Arabs did not settle, Coptic elites remained in power and were likely more lenient with their fellow Copts by allowing taxpayers to pay zero or reduced tax and to accumulate tax arrears (Morimoto 1981).…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66-91;175-81). In response to a series of tax revolts between 726 and 866, they resorted around 900 to tax farming (Sijpesteijn 2009) that remained in effect until 1813. Under this system, the state contracted out the tax collection of each kura to individuals (Morimoto 1981, pp.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations