Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and amenity

Abstract

Most decarbonization scenarios of energy systems necessitate more than 500 Mha of land converted to non-food bioenergy crops to provide both energy substitutes for fossil fuels and negative emissions through bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Understanding the environmental and societal impact of this significant land-use change (LUC) is important in determining where and how bioenergy crops should be deployed, and the trade-offs and co-benefits to the environment and society. Here, we use two systematic reviews and a meta-analysis to assess the existing literature on impacts that are likely to have an important effect on public perceptions of the acceptability of such land use change: biodiversity and amenity value. We focus on the impact of LUC to non-food bioenergy crops on agricultural landscapes, where large-scale bioenergy planting may be required. Our meta-analysis finds strong benefits for biodiversity overall (up 75 % ± 13 %), with particular benefits for bird abundance (+ 81 % ± 32 %), bird species richness (+ 100 % ± 31 %), arthropod abundance (+ 52 % ± 36 %), microbial biomass (+ 77 % ± 24 %), and plant species richness (+ 25 % ± 22 %), when land moves out of either arable crops or grassland to bioenergy production. Conversions from arable land to energy trees led to particularly strong benefits, providing an insight into how future LUC to bioenergy crops could support biodiversity. There were inadequate data to complete a meta-analysis on the effects of bioenergy crops on landscape amenity value, and few generalizable conclusions from systematic review of the literature, however, findings highlight the importance of landscape context and planting strategies in determining amenity values. Our findings demonstrate improved farm-scale biodiversity on agricultural land with bioenergy crops, but also limited knowledge concerning public response to this land use change which could prove crucial to the effective deployment of bioenergy.

Balancing climate goals and biodiversity protection: legal implications of the 30x30 target for land-based carbon removal

“…If that were indeed the case, there would be no contradiction between the UNFCCC and the CBD, since the practice of land-based CDR would also be protected under the CBD. In theory, maintaining peatlands, planting trees, or cultivating bioenergy crops in order to permanently remove CO 2 from the atmosphere could be understood as sustainable use practices or even as beneficial use of biodiversity, provided that the land is not managed monoculturally (Donnison et al, 2020(Donnison et al, , 2021Giuntoli et al, 2022). However, according to Article 2 para.…”

Land for biomass?

“…This competition can lead to trade-offs by diminishing biodiversity and water resources or by causing adverse socio-economic impacts (e.g., increasing the risk in food security) 46 . Conversely, relative to arable land, utilizing land for dedicated energy crops can result in synergies with an increase in, among other things, biodiversity, water conservation, soil carbon stocks and employment (SDG 6 -Clean water and sanitation, SDG 8 -Decent work and economic growth and 15 -Life on Land) [465][466][467] .…”