2005
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2005.1549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar premixed flame extinction limits. II Combined effects of stretch and radiative loss in the single flame unburnt-to-burnt and the twin-flame unburnt-to-unburnt opposed flow configurations

Abstract: Numerical methods have been used to examine the effects of (a) stretch alone, and (b) a combination of stretch and radiative loss, on the properties and extinction limits of methane–air flames near the lean flammability limit. Two axisymmetric opposed flow configurations were examined: (i) a single flame, unburnt-to-burnt (UTB) system in which fresh reactant is opposed by a stream of its own combustion products at the unburnt temperature, and (ii) a symmetric unburnt-to-unburnt (UTU) configuration where twin f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the intended application, the jets could be made to oppose via impinging, or via suction ows to produce either compressional or extensional ows, respectively. 230,231 The concept was originally conceived as a premixed ame stabilization technique, [232][233][234] due to the uniform strain rate inherent in the ow produced by the counter jets 235,236 which is normally not the case for a regular ame surface. 237,238 According to Schaffer and Cambel, 232 the stability of the ame so maintained, is ascribed to the existence of a small reaction zone around the stagnation point of the jet.…”
Section: Opposed Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the intended application, the jets could be made to oppose via impinging, or via suction ows to produce either compressional or extensional ows, respectively. 230,231 The concept was originally conceived as a premixed ame stabilization technique, [232][233][234] due to the uniform strain rate inherent in the ow produced by the counter jets 235,236 which is normally not the case for a regular ame surface. 237,238 According to Schaffer and Cambel, 232 the stability of the ame so maintained, is ascribed to the existence of a small reaction zone around the stagnation point of the jet.…”
Section: Opposed Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%