1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(88)80513-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lactitol vs. lactulose in the treatment of chronic recurrent portal-systemic encephalopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Of these, five evaluated the effect of lactulose, [19][20][21][22][23] two of synbiotics 15,16 and two of probiotics 17,18 on MHE. Eight potentially relevant trials were identified which used lactitol, however, they were excluded either because comparison was not with a placebo, but with an antibiotic 24,25 or different doses of lactitol, 26 or lactulose [27][28][29][30][31] or included patients with OHE. 31 Four controlled trials with lactulose were excluded because either they did not report the outcome of interest (number of patients that improved or worsened with treatment 32 but only mean change in the psychometric tests) or involved patients with OHE 33 or were not placebo controlled (compared with fructo-oligosaccharides 34 ) or was not an RCT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Of these, five evaluated the effect of lactulose, [19][20][21][22][23] two of synbiotics 15,16 and two of probiotics 17,18 on MHE. Eight potentially relevant trials were identified which used lactitol, however, they were excluded either because comparison was not with a placebo, but with an antibiotic 24,25 or different doses of lactitol, 26 or lactulose [27][28][29][30][31] or included patients with OHE. 31 Four controlled trials with lactulose were excluded because either they did not report the outcome of interest (number of patients that improved or worsened with treatment 32 but only mean change in the psychometric tests) or involved patients with OHE 33 or were not placebo controlled (compared with fructo-oligosaccharides 34 ) or was not an RCT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median duration of treatment was 15 days (range 5-360 days). Lactitol has also been used in treatment of HE and meta-analysis showed no statistical differences in percentage of improved patients after lactitol or lactulose while slightly higher frequency of flatulence in patients treated with lactulose compared with lactitol [15][16][17][18][19] (Table 1).…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy Of Non-absorbable Disaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lactulose and lactitol both have been used for the treatment of HE and lactulose has been compared with lactitol in various studies (32,33,(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57) (Table-2). Morgan et al(32) enrolled twenty-five cirrhotic patients experiencing 28 episodes of acute hepatic encephalopathy which were randomized blindly to treatment with either lactitol (n = 15) or lactulose (n = 13).…”
Section: Lactulose Versus Lactitol For the Treatment Of Hepatic Encepmentioning
confidence: 99%