2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-013-2063-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of uniformity in the clinical assessment of children with lipomyelomeningocele: a review of the literature and recommendations for the future

Abstract: This study confirmed that the assessment tools for evaluation of children with LMMC are inconsistent, often vague and poorly validated. This compromises the ability of clinicians who care for them to compare studies across centres for both treated and untreated children. We have sought to highlight those criteria which are relevant, measurable and reproducible and which might be combined into an easily applied assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spina bifida occulta (SBO) is the second major form of NTDs, where the site of the lesion is not left exposed [ 129 , 130 ]. Spina bifida occulta encompasses lipomyelomeningocele ( Figure 1(d) ), lipomeningocele ( Figure 1(e) ), and spinal dorsal dermal sinus tract ( Figure 1(f) ) ranging phenotypically from (i) dysplastic skin, (ii) tuft of hair, and (iii) vestigial tail as well as other forms of spinal dysraphism, which lack a pathogenic representation when the vertebrae develop abnormally leading to absence of the neural arches [ 131 , 132 ]. In symptomatic cases, tethering of the spinal cord within the vertebral canal can result in pain, weakness, and incontinence in otherwise normal, healthy children or adults [ 133 ].…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spina bifida occulta (SBO) is the second major form of NTDs, where the site of the lesion is not left exposed [ 129 , 130 ]. Spina bifida occulta encompasses lipomyelomeningocele ( Figure 1(d) ), lipomeningocele ( Figure 1(e) ), and spinal dorsal dermal sinus tract ( Figure 1(f) ) ranging phenotypically from (i) dysplastic skin, (ii) tuft of hair, and (iii) vestigial tail as well as other forms of spinal dysraphism, which lack a pathogenic representation when the vertebrae develop abnormally leading to absence of the neural arches [ 131 , 132 ]. In symptomatic cases, tethering of the spinal cord within the vertebral canal can result in pain, weakness, and incontinence in otherwise normal, healthy children or adults [ 133 ].…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there is enormous data on TCS in children, there has yet to be a universal scale that can be applied to preoperative and postoperative assessment [15]. We modified a scale that was proposed on the basis of a clinical approach for TCS patients [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature regarding LMM and surgical outcomes is particularly heterogeneous; there are studies from the points of view of urology, orthopedics, neurology, and neurosurgery, and each has their own criteria for both preoperative assessment and postoperative outcomes [21]. Furthermore, Blount and Elton [3] remarked that LMM is often loosely and, incorrectly, defined as any lipomatous formation of the conus medullaris, making it more difficult to adequately compare studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%