1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(95)00009-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of effect of short-term fasting on cognitive function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive function was measured using a computerized task battery that measures multiple modalities of cognitive performance (Green et al, 1995b). These included sustained attention (Bakan vigilance task), short-term memory (word recall task), simple reaction time, motor performance (two ®nger tapping task), and focused attention (Ericksen effect).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive function was measured using a computerized task battery that measures multiple modalities of cognitive performance (Green et al, 1995b). These included sustained attention (Bakan vigilance task), short-term memory (word recall task), simple reaction time, motor performance (two ®nger tapping task), and focused attention (Ericksen effect).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Cognitive function was measured using a computerized task battery that measures multiple modalities of cognitive performance. 4 These included sustained attention (Bakan vigilance task), short-term memory (word recall task), simple reaction time, motor performance (two ®nger tapping task), and focused attention (Ericksen effect); always administered in this order. Subjects were scheduled for the same time each session, between 8:30 am and 11:30 am, and testing lasted about 45 minutes.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 For instance, mild degrees of food restriction per se have been reported to exert either small detrimental effects, 11,12 small bene®cial effects, 11 or no effects at all on cognitive processing. 4 Such work reveals a complex interaction between the meal missed (lunch or breakfast), circadian variation, practice and/or fatigue effects and the domain of cognitive function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant threeway interaction between test session, participant group and trial block (F (16,72) ¼ 2·041, P ¼ 0·022). Post hoc analysis revealed that, while reaction times generally increased over the course of each test session (consistent with a fatigue effect), this effect was significantly larger for the unsupported dieters in the second test session (P , 0·05).…”
Section: Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%