1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb01514.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of effect of ranitidine on the disposition of lignocaine.

Abstract: Cimetidine has been shown to alter the disposition of lignocaine and other drugs that are highly extracted by the liver. In a placebo controlled study ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) did not alter the elimination half-life, systemic clearance or distribution of lignocaine (1 mg/kg) in six healthy subjects. The interaction with cimetidine appears to be unrelated to histamine H2-receptor antagonism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 15% reduction in V.s after ranitidine treatment is consistent with a reduction in the tissue binding of lignocaine since ranitidine does not alter the plasma binding of lignocaine (Feely & Guy, 1983). This reduction in V. is similar to that observed after cimetidine (Wing et al, 1984).…”
Section: Parameters Of Lignocaine Dispositionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 15% reduction in V.s after ranitidine treatment is consistent with a reduction in the tissue binding of lignocaine since ranitidine does not alter the plasma binding of lignocaine (Feely & Guy, 1983). This reduction in V. is similar to that observed after cimetidine (Wing et al, 1984).…”
Section: Parameters Of Lignocaine Dispositionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It is likely that the observed alterations of lignocaine disposition are a direct effect of ranitidine administration, although the order of the control and ranitidine phases was not randomised so that an order effect or a time trend cannot be excluded (Hills & Armitage, 1979). The results of this study are in contrast to those of Feely & Guy (1983) who did not observe a reduction in lignocaine CL after ranitidine pretreatment. However the studies differ in that 6 +1 00 00 e f)f00 0>00 0 ONÕ- Feely & Guy (1983) used a shorter pretreatment phase (1 day vs 5 days); fewer subjects (6 vs 10) and measured plasma CL instead of whole blood CL.…”
Section: Parameters Of Lignocaine Dispositioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In therapeutics, a criterion for the selection of an more potent antagonist, ranitidine, appears not histamine H2-receptor antagonist may be the to have this property (Breen et al, 1982;Feely & knowledge that a clinically important drug Guy, 1983;Reimann et al, 1982;Watts et al, interaction is probable. Whereas cimetidine 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include antipyrine and aminopyrine (Henry et al, 1980), warfarin (Serlin et al, 1979), propranolol (Heagerty et al, 1982) theophylline (Jackson et al, 1981) and lignocaine . In contrast, ranitidine has no effect on the disposition of antipyrine and aminopyrine (Henry et al, 1980), warfarin (Serlin et al, 1981), propranolol (Heagerty et al, 1982), theophylline (Breen et al, 1982) or lignocaine (Feely & Guy, 1983). Both cimetidine (Feely et al, 1981) and ranitidine (Feely & Guy, 1982) reduce liver blood flow, a possible cause of decreased hepatic removal of drugs with high extraction ratios (Wilkinson & Shand, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%