2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of correlation between ex vivo apical dye penetration and presence of apical radiolucencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach allows accessing the level of clinical significance of the results provided by the laboratory models. With a similar model, Susini et al (16) were unable to establish a positive correlation between the dye leakage model and the in vivo presence of periapical radiolucency. Nevertheless, using methylene blue in a dye extraction model was successfully correlated to the quality of the root canal filling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows accessing the level of clinical significance of the results provided by the laboratory models. With a similar model, Susini et al (16) were unable to establish a positive correlation between the dye leakage model and the in vivo presence of periapical radiolucency. Nevertheless, using methylene blue in a dye extraction model was successfully correlated to the quality of the root canal filling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have been criticized for many factors mainly related to preclusion of direct clinical applicability of results. [23][24][25] Several authors also observed divergent results when comparing different types of leakage tests. Barthel et al 26 applied the dye leakage test after mine leakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[10][11][12] The coronal seal prevents the leakage of bacterial endotoxins into the root canal area. The leakage of…”
Section: Microleakage Of Cemented Fiber Postsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary disadvantage is debonding, which is considered a repairable complication. 2,[4][5][6][7][8] In 2005, Mannocci et al 9 presented a study that proved that restorations with fiber posts and composites were more effective than amalgam in preventing root fractures but less effective in preventing secondary caries. For prevention of secondary caries, the extent of microleakage should be taken into consideration while placing adhesively luted fiber posts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%