Putting Labour in Its Place 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-41036-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour and Segmentation in Value Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Braverman's conceptualization of control over the labour process as 'the dictation of each step of the process, including its mode of performance' (Braverman, 1998: 69) is neglected also in Hammer and Riisgard (2015), who see the division of labour on the level of labour market division (into its formal and informal part) and put the emphasis on the control over bodies, eventually, control of performance. McGrath-Champ et al (2015) link labour process analysis with the global value chain perspective (how labour-intensive versus more automatated manner of e-waste disassembly determines value chain form), but they are not interested in dynamics of this configuration.…”
Section: Views On the Evolution Of Mncsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Braverman's conceptualization of control over the labour process as 'the dictation of each step of the process, including its mode of performance' (Braverman, 1998: 69) is neglected also in Hammer and Riisgard (2015), who see the division of labour on the level of labour market division (into its formal and informal part) and put the emphasis on the control over bodies, eventually, control of performance. McGrath-Champ et al (2015) link labour process analysis with the global value chain perspective (how labour-intensive versus more automatated manner of e-waste disassembly determines value chain form), but they are not interested in dynamics of this configuration.…”
Section: Views On the Evolution Of Mncsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This we do in recognition of Cunnison’s (1966: 272) guiding principle that ‘to understand the social processes of a unique work situation, the sociologist must be aware of the general structure and processes of change in the society that he [sic] is studying’. As Bair and Werner (2015: 131) affirm, it remains of key importance that we understand labour ‘beyond the [global production] network’ if we are to fully appreciate the way that labour processes are shaped at local level (see also, Cumbers et al, 2008: 370; Hammer and Riisgaard, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the article contributes empirically to our understanding of the ways that ‘living embodied labour become[s] value for capital’ at workplace level (Bair and Werner, 2015: 131; Cumbers et al, 2008). Theoretically, the article illuminates the interaction of local social relations and global supply chain pressures as part of the ‘uneven development’ of contemporary capitalism (Bair and Werner, 2015: 127; see also Cumbers et al, 2008; Hammer and Riisgaard, 2015: 83–5). In this respect, the article also traces the connection between the market imperatives of lead firms and the lived-experiences of workers at the bottom of the chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine, 1998;Peck, 1996;Rubery, 2007; also, for feminist approaches to global commodity chains, Dunaway, 2014). Segmentation dynamics shape how particular firms and workplaces can compete for positions in the division of labour (Hammer and Riisgaard, 2015). Yet, insofar as they are key in translating GVCs' quality and performance requirements, they also underpin any disconnections in the functional division of labour.…”
Section: Linking the Labour Process And Value Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%